Week In Review
- Elissa D. Hecker - Editor
- Jul 29
- 24 min read
By Celine Agard
Edited by Elissa D. Hecker
Entertainment
FCC Approves Skydance’s $8 Billion Merger with Paramount
The FCC has approved an $8 billion merger between Paramount and Skydance, ending months of political and media scrutiny. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr praised the deal after Skydance pledged to avoid diversity, equity, and inclusion programs and promised fair journalism—moves that critics say threaten press freedom. The merger, led by David Ellison, marks a shift in control from the Redstone family and comes amid accusations that Paramount’s recent $16 million settlement with President Trump was a politically motivated payoff. Controversy also surrounds the cancellation of Stephen Colbert’s show and resignations at CBS News, raising concerns over political interference. Despite internal turmoil and legal battles, the deal is set to close soon, though future leadership and potential cost-cutting remain uncertain.
Paramount Settled with Trump. Its Shows are Skewering Him
This week, major Paramount personalities—South Park creators, Stephen Colbert, and Jon Stewart—openly criticized both Trump and their own company following a controversial $16 million lawsuit settlement between Trump and Paramount. In a biting South Park episode, Trump was mocked alongside Paramount’s alleged censorship, while Colbert and Stewart questioned the motivations behind the abrupt cancellation of The Late Show. Though Paramount cited financial losses, critics—including Democratic lawmakers—suspect political pressure tied to a pending merger with Skydance played a role. Despite corporate pushback, these media figures are using their platforms to challenge what they see as corporate capitulation to Trump.
Shia LaBeouf Settles Sexual Battery Lawsuit by FKA Twigs
Shia LaBeouf and musician FKA twigs have settled a high-profile lawsuit in which she accused him of sexual battery and abuse during their nearly year-long relationship. Filed in 2020, the suit detailed allegations of abuse, including LaBeouf knowingly transmitting an STD, choking, and threatening her. The joint statement from their lawyers emphasized a mutual wish for personal happiness, professional success, and peace, while the settlement terms remain confidential. Following the lawsuit, LaBeouf acknowledged a troubled past with aggression and alcoholism and sought treatment, while FKA twigs has continued her music career with critical acclaim.
Spotify Latest AI Mess Exposes the Platform’s Lax Controls – with Deceased Artists and Estates the Latest Targets
An AI-generated song titled “Together” was mistakenly uploaded to the official Spotify page of late country artist Blaze Foley, sparking criticism of Spotify’s failure to safeguard artists’ legacies and listener trust. Though Spotify quickly removed the track and blamed the distributor SoundOn for violating its deceptive content policy, critics argue that the platform’s reactive approach is inadequate—especially for deceased artists whose estates may not constantly monitor their digital presence. The incident underscores a broader issue in the streaming era: the lack of proactive content verification and safeguards against AI-generated impersonations. Advocates are calling for stricter pre-release approval systems, clear AI labeling, and protections similar to those offered by platforms like Facebook for deceased users. Without meaningful reform, Spotify risks undermining trust and allowing digital legacies to be compromised.
Arts
Amy Sherald Cancels Her Smithsonian Show, City Censorship
Amy Sherald, acclaimed artist known for her Michelle Obama portrait, withdrew her upcoming solo exhibition from the Smithsonian’s National Portrait Gallery after learning the museum considered removing her painting "Trans Forming Liberty," which depicts a transgender Statue of Liberty, to avoid provoking the Trump administration. Sherald rejected a proposal to replace the painting with a video discussing transgender issues, viewing it as diluting the work’s message amid a politically hostile climate toward trans visibility. The Smithsonian, under scrutiny by the Trump administration for alleged ideological bias, stated the video was meant to accompany—not replace—the painting. Sherald’s withdrawal highlights tensions over censorship, representation, and political pressure in national museums, especially as transgender rights face increasing legislative attacks nationwide.
Louis Vuitton Netherlands Entangled in Money-Laundering Case
Dutch prosecutors are investigating Louis Vuitton Netherlands after a Chinese customer allegedly laundered nearly €3 million through cash purchases of luxury goods over 18 months, consistently spending just under the €10,000 reporting threshold to avoid detection. Authorities accuse the customer of using multiple names and email accounts to buy goods, which were then shipped to Hong Kong and China, with alleged insider help from a Louis Vuitton employee. The case highlights how luxury goods markets can be exploited for money laundering, exploiting loopholes in financial oversight and regulatory thresholds. Despite not having the same obligations as banks, luxury retailers are expected under Dutch law to report suspicious transactions, yet the scheme reportedly went unnoticed, exposing ongoing challenges in combating financial crime through high-end markets globally.
Sports
Trump signs executive order aimed at bringing order to college sports: Here’s what it means
Trump signed an executive order aimed at stabilizing college sports amid ongoing legal, political, and financial turmoil, though experts and college leaders stress that lasting reform must come from federal legislation. The order supports NCAA priorities, including blocking athletes from being classified as employees, prohibiting pay-for-play schemes (while allowing fair market endorsements), and preserving non-revenue and women’s sports. It directs federal agencies to weigh in on employment status, Title IX enforcement, and potential legal challenges to conflicting state laws. Though praised by major conferences and some university officials, critics argue that the order aligns too closely with NCAA interests, lacks enforceability, and may deepen uncertainty in higher education, especially with threats to federal funding and shifting political dynamics.
Education Department Will Investigate Scholarships for DACA Students
The executive order directs federal agencies to weigh in on employment status, Title IX enforcement, and potential legal challenges to conflicting state laws.
Trump calls for Commanders to use original nickname, threatens stadium deal
Trump has called for the NFL’s Washington Commanders and MLB’s Cleveland Guardians to revert to their previous names—the Redskins and Indians—arguing that many Native Americans want the change and that the current names diminish their heritage. He threatens to block a stadium deal in Washington, D.C. if the Commanders don’t revert and criticizes Guardians part-owner Matt Dolan for supporting the name change, linking it to his political losses. Both teams began rebranding in 2020 amid national racial justice protests, and although the names faced backlash from some fans, current team leadership in both organizations have expressed commitment to moving forward under the new branding. Trump's statements reflect his ongoing involvement in divisive sports culture debates and his use of sports as a political platform.
Transgender woman sues Princeton for removal from track meet
A transgender woman, Sadie Schreiner, has sued Princeton University, alleging she was unlawfully removed from competing in a school-hosted track meet due to her gender identity. The lawsuit, filed in New Jersey Superior Court, names Princeton, two athletic officials, and a timing service as defendants, citing violations of New Jersey’s anti-discrimination laws that protect transgender individuals in public accommodations like schools. Schreiner, who transitioned during high school and previously competed for Rochester Institute of Technology, claims she was barred from running just minutes before her race despite providing identification affirming her female gender. The case arises amid national controversies over transgender participation in women’s sports, intensified by recent NCAA policy changes and a Trump administration executive order restricting transgender athletes’ eligibility in female competitions.
A Little League player was suspended for a bat flip. His family took legal action-and won.
A 12-year-old Little League player, Marco Rocco, who was suspended after a bat-flip celebration following a two-run homer in a New Jersey state final game, was cleared by a judge to play in the championship round. Judge Robert G. Malestein issued an emergency temporary restraining order, ruling the suspension caused “immediate and reparable harm” by barring Rocco from a critical game. Although initially benched, Marco later entered the game, but his team lost 10-0. The suspension stemmed from Little League officials labeling his bat flip as “unsportsmanlike conduct” and “horseplay,” despite past promotion of bat flips by Little League. Marco’s family pursued legal action after failing to reach a compromise with Little League International, emphasizing Marco’s dream to reach the Little League World Series.
Players found not guilty in Hockey Canada sexual assault trial
Five former members of Canada’s 2018 World Junior hockey team—Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dubé, and Cal Foote—were acquitted of sexual assault charges related to a 2018 incident involving a woman identified as E.M., following a high-profile trial. Ontario Superior Court Justice Maria Carroccia ruled that the Crown failed to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, citing concerns about the complainant’s credibility and memory. The trial, which faced a mistrial and multiple delays, stemmed from allegations of group sexual assault in a London, Ontario hotel room during a Hockey Canada event. The case sparked national outrage, particularly after it was revealed that Hockey Canada had previously settled a civil lawsuit related to the allegations without consulting the players. Defense lawyers criticized the prosecution for pursuing a case they claim was flawed from the start, while E.M.’s attorney expressed disappointment in the verdict, emphasizing systemic failures in addressing sexual violence. The Crown has 30 days to decide whether to appeal the decision.
Qatar confirms bid to host 2036 Olympic and Paralympic Games
The Qatar Olympic Committee has officially confirmed its bid to host the 2036 Olympic and Paralympic Games in Doha, highlighting that 95% of the necessary sports infrastructure is already in place and emphasizing a commitment to sustainability, inclusivity, and international cooperation. Qatar’s previous bids for 2016 and 2020 failed amid concerns about its small size, extreme heat, and serious human rights issues, including anti-LGBTQ+ laws and poor treatment of migrant workers, many of whom died building World Cup stadiums. While the country has since hosted several major international sporting events, helping improve its global sporting profile, questions remain over workers’ rights and free expression. The bid faces stiff competition from cities in Indonesia, Turkey, India, and Chile, and potential rivals like Saudi Arabia. The IOC has also suggested flexibility on moving the Games away from summer months to accommodate new host regions’ climates. Despite progress, Qatar must address its human rights record and overcome skepticism about its ability to attract global audiences compared to larger countries like India.
Media/Technology
Anthropic faces Potential business-ending liability in statutory damages after Judge Alsup certifies class action by Bartz
Anthropic, valued at $100 billion despite only $3 billion in annual revenue, faces potentially devastating copyright liability after a federal judge certified a class action against it for downloading millions of pirated books from shadow libraries LibGen and PiLiMi. The certified class covers copyrighted works meeting specific registration criteria, with up to several million infringed works possible. Statutory damages per work range from $750 to $30,000 for standard infringement, and up to $150,000 for willful infringement, which the judge suggests may apply given Anthropic’s “Napster-like” behavior. Depending on the number of works included, total damages could theoretically exceed Anthropic’s entire valuation, reaching tens of billions or more, posing a significant risk that could threaten the company’s financial viability and strongly incentivize settlement.
Trump Plans to Give A.I. Developers a Free Hand
Trump unveiled a sweeping “A.I. Action Plan” aimed at accelerating American leadership in artificial intelligence by slashing regulations, fast-tracking infrastructure projects, and limiting government purchases of A.I. systems deemed ideologically biased. Through three executive orders, Trump positioned the U.S. to dominate the global A.I. race by promoting industry growth, reducing environmental oversight for data centers, and prioritizing “non-woke” A.I. models. The plan also seeks to counter China’s influence and expand exports of American A.I. products. Critics warn that the lack of safeguards could lead to unchecked technological harms, while Trump’s approach marks a sharp departure from the more regulation-focused A.I. policies of the Biden administration.
Trump Derides Copyright and State Rules in AI Action Plan Launch
Trump criticized strict copyright enforcement and state-level A.I. laws, calling them unrealistic and harmful to U.S. competitiveness, especially against China. While the plan avoids addressing copyright directly, Trump signed three executive orders to fast-track A.I. infrastructure, expand A.I. exports, and ban government use of A.I. with “partisan bias.” He also called for a single federal A.I. standard to override state laws. Critics warn the plan favors industry interests and could undermine civil rights and regulatory oversight.
Senators Introduce Bipartisan Bill Targeting Unauthorized Artificial Intelligence Training: ‘A.I. Companies are robbing the American People Blind’
Bipartisan U.S. senators Richard Blumenthal and Josh Hawley have introduced the AI Accountability and Personal Data Protection Act to combat what they call rampant intellectual property theft by generative A.I. companies. The bill allows individuals to sue A.I. developers for using personal data and copyrighted works—including unregistered content—without explicit consent. It broadly defines "covered data" to include any personal or creative information tied to an individual and prohibits coercive or deceptive consent practices. The law also blocks arbitration clauses from preventing class-action lawsuits. Music industry groups, like the Nashville Songwriters Association International, have voiced strong support, praising the bill for aligning with their core principles of permission, payment, proof, and penalties in the A.I. era.
White House Bans Wall Street Journal From Press Pool on Trump’s Scotland Trip
Trump has sued The Wall Street Journal for defamation over an article linking him to Jeffrey Epstein, claiming a lewd 2003 birthday note described in the piece was fake. In response, the White House barred Journal reporters from the press pool for Trump's upcoming trip to Scotland, citing the outlet's “fake and defamatory conduct.” The move drew criticism from the White House Correspondents’ Association, which called it a troubling violation of First Amendment principles. The Journal and its parent companies, including Dow Jones and News Corp, have stood by their reporting and vowed to fight the lawsuit. This marks another instance of the Trump administration sidelining media outlets it deems unfavorable.
Trump Loses Copyright Fight Over Woodward Interview Recordings
A federal judge in the Southern District of New York dismissed Trump’s copyright lawsuit over The Trump Tapes, ruling that journalist Bob Woodward—not Trump—holds the rights to their recorded interviews. Trump argued that he was either a joint author or owned the copyright in his individual statements, but the court rejected all claims, citing contradictions in his pleadings and established legal precedents. Judge Paul Gardephe found that Woodward controlled the interviews’ structure, recording, and publication, while Trump’s responses lacked independent fixation and meaning. The ruling also dismissed Trump’s contract and unjust enrichment claims as preempted by copyright law. The decision, part of a broader trend of Trump’s copyright losses, is seen as a strong Second Circuit precedent affirming that interviewers—not subjects—own the rights to recorded conversations unless a clear agreement says otherwise.
Donations to NPR and PBS Stations Surge after Funding Cuts
After Congress eliminated $535 million in annual federal funding for PBS, NPR, and local public media stations, donors have stepped up with a surge of support—but it's not enough to close the gap. Roughly 120,000 new donors have pledged about $20 million in annual contributions, with overall donations rising $70 million compared to last year. While encouraging, public media leaders caution that this uptick may not be sustainable. Some stations, like Rocky Mountain Public Media and WUNC, saw record-breaking donations, but executives warn that long-term survival will require continued support, innovation, and potential help from philanthropic foundations. Both PBS and NPR are implementing hiring freezes and spending cuts to weather the shortfall.
Macrons Sue Candace Owens, Right-Wing Podcaster, Claiming Defamation
French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte Macron, have filed a defamation lawsuit in Delaware against American right-wing podcaster Candace Owens, who falsely claimed that Brigitte is a man. The suit accuses Owens of spreading the baseless claims to gain attention and profit, despite repeated requests for a retraction. It outlines 22 counts of defamation and other related claims, citing Owens’s continued promotion of the rumors through podcasts, social media, merchandise, and videos. The Macrons argue that the campaign has caused significant personal harm, and that legal action was necessary after Owens repeatedly mocked their attempts to correct the record.
Chinese Hackers are Exploiting Flaws in Widely Used Software, Microsoft Says
Microsoft revealed that Chinese state-sponsored hacking groups, including Linen Typhoon, Violet Typhoon, and Storm-2603, exploited security flaws in its widely used SharePoint collaboration software to breach systems of U.S. government agencies and global organizations in sectors like defense, media, healthcare, and finance. The vulnerabilities allowed hackers to access sensitive SharePoint content and execute code remotely, potentially stealing cryptographic keys to maintain long-term network access even after patches. The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency alerted affected critical infrastructure entities, while Microsoft coordinated with government agencies to respond. The breach highlights the increasing sophistication and precision of Chinese cyber espionage efforts targeting high-value networks, with over 400 SharePoint servers reportedly compromised worldwide, emphasizing urgent need for thorough security measures beyond patching.
Meta Rejects EU’s AI Code of Practice, even as A.I. Giants Anthropic and OpenAI Say they will Sign On
Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, has announced it will not sign the European Union's voluntary AI Code of Practice, citing legal uncertainties and overreach beyond the EU’s AI Act. The Code aims to regulate general-purpose A.I. models, particularly restricting how copyrighted content is collected and requiring companies to be transparent about their copyright policies. While companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Microsoft support the Code, Meta argues that it could hinder A.I. innovation in Europe and create unnecessary complexity. This decision comes amid rising concerns about A.I. companies using pirated content for training, with Meta and Anthropic facing legal scrutiny. Critics warn that without stronger compliance, Europe risks falling behind in A.I. development, while supporters believe the Code promotes transparency and safeguards intellectual property.
General News
Supreme Court, for Now, Pauses Lower Court Decision Limiting Voting Rights Act
The Supreme Court has temporarily blocked a federal appeals court ruling that would drastically limit the Voting Rights Act by preventing private individuals and groups from suing to challenge racial discrimination in voting. The case, Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians v. Howe, centers on a challenge to North Dakota’s legislative map brought by two tribes and Native American voters. A lower court ruled they lacked standing under the Act, a decision that could severely weaken civil rights enforcement. The Supreme Court’s pause allows time to decide whether to hear the case, which could become the second major voting rights case in its upcoming term.
Hundreds of NASA Employees, Past and Present, Sign Letter of Formal Dissent
Nearly 300 current and former NASA employees signed the “Voyager Declaration,” a formal letter of dissent urging agency leadership to reject deep budget cuts proposed by the Trump administration, which would slash NASA’s science funding by nearly half and terminate 19 ongoing missions. The signatories argue that these politically driven cuts threaten human safety, scientific progress, and national interests, while also violating congressional mandates. Despite fears of retaliation, many employees voiced their concerns about the loss of institutional knowledge and the long-term damage to NASA's mission. The protest follows similar actions at other federal agencies and has drawn support from Nobel laureates and advocacy groups, with critics accusing NASA of prematurely implementing the administration’s proposals before congressional decisions.
Read the NASA ‘Voyager Declaration’ Letter of Dissent
Johnson Retreats on Demand for Epstein Disclosures, Saying Trump Needs ‘Space’
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson reversed his earlier call for the Justice Department to release all files related to Jeffrey Epstein, backing off after intense pressure from Trump and his MAGA base. Last week, Johnson had broken ranks with the president by advocating for full transparency, but he now says there will be no House vote on the matter before the summer recess, aligning once again with the president. Johnson cited Trump’s authorization for Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek release of select grand jury testimony as sufficient for now. The reversal highlights a growing divide within the GOP over the Epstein case, as some hardline Republicans continue pushing for a full release of documents, warning that half-measures will not satisfy their base.
Trump’s Student Arrests, and the Lawsuit Fighting Them, Tread New Ground
The Trump administration's unprecedented use of a rarely invoked immigration law to deport foreign students expressing pro-Palestinian views has raised significant legal and constitutional concerns. Ordered by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, these detentions — including high-profile cases like that of Columbia graduate Mahmoud Khalil — were justified under a provision allowing deportation if a noncitizen's presence threatens U.S. foreign policy. Critics, including academic groups, civil rights organizations, and legal scholars, argue the policy violates First Amendment protections and was used to suppress political dissent on campuses, particularly speech critical of Israel. While the government denies targeting activists, the policy’s vague legal foundation and selective application suggest a shift toward weaponizing immigration law to silence opposition. The case now before a federal judge could set a major precedent on the balance between executive immigration powers and free speech rights for noncitizens.
Big Law Firms Bowed to Trump. A Corps of ‘Little Guys’ Jumped in to Fight Him.
In response to Trump’s executive orders targeting major law firms, many large firms backed away from pro bono cases opposing his administration, but a surge of solo practitioners, small firms, and former government lawyers stepped in to fill the void. Organizations like Lawyers for Good Government formed initiatives like the Pro Bono Litigation Corps to organize legal challenges to the administration’s policies, especially in areas like environmental justice, immigration, and civil service protections. Despite Big Law’s hesitancy—driven by fear of retaliation and lost government contracts—these smaller legal actors have become a powerful force, filing hundreds of lawsuits and winning key injunctions. Many see their work as essential to upholding democratic principles and protecting the rights of vulnerable communities, with some lawyers citing personal conviction and civic duty as their motivation. The movement reflects both a decentralization of legal resistance and the resilience of America’s legal system beyond its largest firms.
Government’s H.R. Arm Shedding a Third of Staff
The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has reduced its workforce by 10% since Trump’s return to office, with over 750 employees resigning through incentive programs, more than 150 resigning without incentives, and 129 laid off. Starting the year with 3,110 staff, the agency plans to further shrink to around 2,000 employees by year-end, also cutting contractor numbers by half. This downsizing aligns with the administration’s broader goal to reduce the federal workforce, a trend seen in other agencies like Health and Human Services and the State Department, which have also conducted large layoffs. Many employees have voluntarily left, lessening the need for additional firings, as seen at the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Trump Told Park Workers to Report Displays that ‘Disparage’ Americans. Here’s What They Flagged.
The Trump administration has directed the National Park Service to review and potentially remove or alter signs, exhibits, and displays at hundreds of national parks and historic sites that it deems “inappropriately disparaging” to Americans, aiming to promote a more positive narrative of the nation’s history and landscape. This includes content addressing difficult topics such as slavery, Native American imprisonment, and climate change impacts. The directive has sparked concern among historians, park employees, and advocacy groups who warn it risks erasing or whitewashing important, often painful parts of American history, including the struggles of marginalized groups. Many park staff feel caught between following the order and preserving historical integrity, while critics argue that honest storytelling about America’s complex past is essential for understanding and progress.
White House Leads Push to Block Watchdog’s Inquiries Spending Cuts
Republicans, working with the Trump White House, are attempting to weaken the Government Accountability Office (GAO) as it investigates whether the administration illegally withheld billions in congressionally approved funds—a practice known as impoundment. The GAO, a long-established nonpartisan watchdog responsible for overseeing federal spending, has opened dozens of inquiries into withheld funds related to foreign aid, climate programs, public health, and education, finding multiple violations by the Trump administration. In response, White House officials, led by budget director Russell T. Vought, have attacked the GAO’s authority, refused cooperation, and pushed legislation to slash its budget and limit its power, including restricting its ability to sue the government. This escalating conflict reflects broader disputes over congressional power of the purse, with Republicans supporting an expansive view of presidential spending authority that critics say undermines government oversight and accountability.
Gobbard Releases New Documents Targeting Obama Administration, as Justice Dept. Forms Task Force
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has intensified her criticism of the 2016 U.S. intelligence assessment that concluded Russia favored Trump in the presidential election, claiming it was part of a conspiracy orchestrated by President Obama to undermine Trump. Gabbard released previously unreleased documents, including a 2017 Republican-led House Intelligence Committee report, which argued that the assessment was rushed and based on unreliable sources—claims that conflict with bipartisan Senate findings affirming the original conclusions. The Justice Department also formed a new task force to investigate Trump’s unsubstantiated allegations that Obama ordered the Russia investigation to sabotage his campaign. Critics, including Democrats and intelligence veterans, argue that Gabbard's efforts politicize intelligence and risk exposing sensitive sources, while supporters frame the move as a push for accountability.
Targeting Obama, Trump’s Retribution Campaign Takes Another Turn
In his second term, Trump has reignited efforts to prosecute his political enemies, particularly Obama and officials from past administrations, now backed by loyal aides more willing to carry out his directives. After previously targeting a wide range of perceived adversaries—including law firms, universities, and journalists—Trump has returned to his original calls for retribution tied to the 2016 Russia investigation. Intelligence officials under his administration, including CIA Director John Ratcliffe and DNI Tulsi Gabbard, have pushed unsubstantiated claims that Obama and his team orchestrated a treasonous conspiracy against Trump. While the Justice Department has launched a task force to review the allegations, there is no concrete evidence of criminal wrongdoing, and legal challenges remain due to presidential immunity. Nonetheless, Trump has used his administration to punish institutions and individuals he sees as hostile, from cutting funding to Harvard to suing major news outlets, signaling a broader strategy of using government power for personal vendettas.
Pentagon Suspends its Participation in Think Tank Forums
The Pentagon has announced it will suspend participation in all national security events hosted by think tanks, citing a need to avoid lending credibility to organizations that conflict with the current administration's values. This decision follows the abrupt withdrawal from the Aspen Security Forum and reflects a broader shift under Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who has distanced the Department of Defense from traditional international security forums. Unlike his predecessors, Hegseth has shown little interest in engaging with global defense circles, with Pentagon officials accusing some events of promoting "globalism" and showing "hatred" toward Trump. The move marks a significant departure from longstanding bipartisan practices of using such platforms to communicate U.S. defense policy and build international partnerships.
Trump Releases Thousands of Martin Luther King Jr. Files
The Trump administration released over 6,000 documents—nearly a quarter-million pages—related to the 1968 assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., promoting the move as a step toward transparency. However, historians found little new information in the trove, noting that crucial FBI wiretaps and surveillance materials remain sealed until 2027. The documents include investigative notes, public tips, and odd details about James Earl Ray, King’s killer, but much of the content was already known or barely legible. Critics warn the FBI files should be viewed skeptically, given the agency’s documented efforts to smear King. King’s children urged the public to engage with the material respectfully, while some viewed the release as a political distraction amid calls to disclose Jeffrey Epstein-related files.
Appeals Court Blocks California’s Background Checks for Ammunition Buyers
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled 2-1 that California’s law requiring background checks for ammunition buyers is unconstitutional, violating the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. Enacted in 2019 following a 2016 ballot initiative championed by then-Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom, the law mandated background checks similar to those for handgun purchases, aiming to prevent sales to individuals with criminal records or mental health issues. The majority opinion held that the law “meaningfully constrains” gun owners’ rights, while the dissent argued it posed only minimal barriers and was constitutional. The ruling marks the latest chapter in a seven-year legal battle influenced by the Supreme Court’s 2022 Bruen decision, which requires gun laws to be assessed based on historical tradition. Gun rights groups praised the decision, while gun control advocates urged a rehearing, citing evidence that the law improved public safety by blocking dangerous individuals from obtaining ammunition.
Alina Habba is Named Acting U.S. Attorney in New Jersey
Alina Habba will remain as acting U.S. attorney for New Jersey after the Trump administration withdrew her nomination for the permanent role, allowing her to bypass a legal restriction and extend her tenure for at least 210 more days. This move ended a chaotic standoff between federal judges, who had appointed experienced prosecutor Desiree Leigh Grace, and the Justice Department, which fired Grace shortly after her appointment. Habba, a former Trump lawyer with no prosecutorial background, has led the office through partisan controversy and investigations targeting Democrats, while her appointment reflects the Trump administration’s broader push to assert political control over the Justice Department. The leadership turmoil disrupted the office’s operations, suspending grand jury and plea proceedings, and sidelined Grace—a widely respected prosecutor known for her work on gang violence—despite bipartisan support and past praise from Habba herself.
Showdown in New Jersey Over Top Federal Prosecutor
The leadership of the U.S. attorney’s office in New Jersey has become contentious after federal judges rejected President Trump appointee Alina Habba’s bid to continue as interim U.S. attorney and instead appointed Desiree Leigh Grace, Habba’s former first assistant, to the position. However, Attorney General Pam Bondi swiftly intervened, firing Grace and defending Habba on social media, accusing the judges of overstepping their authority and colluding with Democratic senators who oppose Habba’s confirmation. Habba, Trump’s former personal lawyer with no prosecutorial experience, has faced criticism for politically motivated investigations into Democrats and a rocky tenure. The standoff highlights tensions between the Trump administration’s efforts to maintain loyal Justice Department leadership and the judiciary’s rare use of statutory power to appoint interim U.S. attorneys, raising questions about separation of powers and the politicization of the Justice Department.
Trump Administration Sues Adams and New York City Over Sanctuary Laws
The Justice Department sued New York City Mayor Eric Adams and other city officials, accusing them of obstructing federal immigration enforcement through sanctuary city policies that limit cooperation with ICE. The lawsuit argues that federal immigration law preempts local laws under the Constitution’s supremacy clause and claims New York’s restrictions have allowed criminals to be released instead of deported. Although Adams had aligned with the Trump administration on immigration issues—helping secure dropped corruption charges against him—the relationship has soured amid rising tensions, especially after the shooting of a customs officer by undocumented immigrants. City officials defend sanctuary policies as protecting immigrants’ rights and public safety, while the Trump administration and New York’s Attorney General Pam Bondi contend the city endangers communities by shielding criminals from federal immigration actions.
Columbia and Penn Made Trump Deals More Universities Could be Next
The Trump administration has struck controversial deals with Columbia University and the University of Pennsylvania, using threats of massive research funding cuts to pressure them into aligning with White House demands on campus protests, transgender athlete participation, and other politically charged issues. These settlements are being positioned as models for other elite universities—like Harvard, Brown, and Princeton—to follow, raising alarm among academics who fear the erosion of institutional independence and academic freedom. While Columbia agreed to a $221 million settlement and policy concessions, Penn made ideological commitments without financial penalties. Critics warn that these agreements set a dangerous precedent, enabling future political coercion of higher education institutions under the guise of combating antisemitism or protecting meritocracy.
Disabled Americans Fear What Medicaid Cuts Could Do to Them
A new law signed by President Trump includes roughly $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts over the next decade, raising serious concerns among families of disabled Americans and health care experts that vital home- and community-based care services may be at risk. While the White House insists these cuts won't affect such services, experts argue that states may be forced to reduce or eliminate them due to financial pressures, especially as provider tax limits shrink federal matching funds. Families like that of 10-year-old June Rice, who relies on Medicaid-funded in-home care to live outside an institution, fear devastating consequences. Advocates warn that reduced funding could lead to more restrictive eligibility, fewer care hours, lower worker pay, and longer waitlists—jeopardizing the independence and well-being of millions who rely on these services to live dignified, integrated lives.
UnitedHealth Will Cooperate with Federal Probe of its Medicare Billing Practices
UnitedHealth Group announced it is cooperating with the U.S. Department of Justice following reports of a federal investigation into its Medicare Advantage business. The probe focuses on allegations that the company overbilled Medicare by inflating patient diagnoses to receive higher payments. As the largest provider of these private plans, which have become a major revenue stream, UnitedHealth is under heightened scrutiny, especially as regulators crack down on potentially abusive billing practices. The company, which also owns a vast physician network through its Optum unit, stated it proactively contacted the DOJ, maintains confidence in its practices, and is conducting an internal review. The investigation comes amid broader company turmoil, including leadership changes and falling stock prices.
‘I Want to Clear My Name’: Deported Migrant Takes First Step to Sue the U.S.
Neiyerver Adrián Leon Rengel, a Venezuelan migrant, filed a $1.3 million claim against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security on Thursday, alleging wrongful detention and deportation after he was sent without due process to El Salvador's infamous Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT), where he says he endured four months of abuse. Rengel, who had no serious criminal record and was applying for Temporary Protected Status, claims he was misidentified as a gang member based on his tattoos and was secretly removed from the U.S. under the Trump administration's mass deportation policy, which used the rarely invoked Alien Enemies Act. His case is the first legal action among 252 Venezuelan men deported in a controversial move criticized for bypassing legal protections and violating human rights. Rengel's lawyers and civil rights groups plan to file additional claims on behalf of other deportees, while Rengel himself hopes his experience brings awareness and justice to protect future migrants.
Judge Sentences Ex-Officer in Breonna Taylor Raid to Nearly 3 Years in Prison
A federal judge in Kentucky sentenced former Louisville police officer Brett Hankison to nearly three years in prison for violating Breonna Taylor’s civil rights by using excessive force during a 2020 raid, sharply rejecting the Trump administration’s request that he serve only one day. Hankison was convicted for firing shots through Taylor’s window, though none hit her; he was the only officer charged in the botched raid that killed Taylor, a case that sparked national outrage over police violence and “no knock” warrants. The lenient sentencing request from the Trump-appointed Justice Department’s civil rights division, led by a political appointee aligned with Trump, drew widespread criticism and protests, highlighting tensions over the administration’s shift away from aggressively addressing racial disparities in policing. The judge’s sentence, though harsher than requested, was far below the maximum penalty, while other officers involved faced no charges.
A Timeline of the Etan Patz Case
Six-year-old Etan Patz disappeared in Manhattan’s SoHo neighborhood in 1979, sparking national attention and heightened awareness about child safety. Despite extensive investigations and two criminal trials, the case remained unresolved for decades. In 2012, Pedro Hernandez confessed to killing Etan but later recanted; after a mistrial in 2015, Hernandez was convicted in 2017. However, in 2025, a federal appeals court overturned his conviction due to procedural errors during the trial, ordering his release unless a new trial is granted. The case continues to evoke deep questions about what truly happened to Etan Patz.
U.S. Says it will Withdraw from U.N. Cultural Organization, Again
The Trump administration announced that the United States will withdraw from UNESCO by the end of 2026, marking the third U.S. exit from the U.N.’s cultural agency. This move, part of a broader rejection of multilateral organizations, follows the administration’s previous exits from the World Health Organization and the U.N. Human Rights Council. Citing UNESCO’s alleged promotion of divisive agendas and anti-Israel bias, the State Department claimed continued membership was contrary to U.S. interests. UNESCO expressed regret over the decision but stated it had prepared financially, with U.S. contributions making up only 8% of its budget. Critics, including Representative Gregory Meeks, condemned the move as damaging to U.S. leadership and international influence, especially in areas like Holocaust education and the development of A.I. standards, where China could now gain more sway.
Global Markets Rally on Japan Deal Euphoria
The Trump administration announced a new trade deal with Japan setting 15% tariffs on imports, lower than the previously threatened 25% but higher than the hoped-for 10%, signaling a potential baseline for upcoming agreements with other countries like the European Union and Switzerland. The deal, which includes Japan agreeing to import more rice, has spurred stock rallies in Asia and Europe ahead of critical trade talks with China scheduled next week. Meanwhile, the administration’s influence extends into other sectors, with Coca-Cola planning to offer a cane sugar version of its soda in response to political pressure, and labor policies shifting as Trump’s nominees aim to reinstate a functioning National Labor Relations Board with a Republican majority, potentially rolling back Biden-era worker protections. The overall environment reflects ongoing tensions in trade, regulatory policies, and economic leadership under Trump’s second term.
Comments