Week In Review
- Elissa D. Hecker - Editor
- May 6
- 29 min read
By Celine Agard
Edited by Elissa D. Hecker
Entertainment
Copyright Protection in the Music Industry in China
China has significantly advanced its music copyright protection since the enactment of its first Copyright Law in 1991. The country has amended the law multiple times to address challenges posed by digitalization and artificial intelligence. The National Copyright Administration of China (NCAC) plans to release its next 5-year copyright plan in 2026, aiming to further strengthen intellectual property rights and support the creative industries.
‘Grandpa Robbers’ Go on Trial in Paris Over 2016 Kim Kardashian Heist
Ten people connected to a group dubbed the “grandpa robbers” are on trial in Paris for their roles in the 2016 armed robbery of Kim Kardashian, during which she was bound, gagged, and held at gunpoint in a luxury residence during Paris Fashion Week. The robbers, disguised as police, stole over $9 million in jewelry, including her $4 million engagement ring, in a heist that raised global concerns about tourist safety in Paris. DNA evidence, surveillance, and wiretaps led to the suspects, several of whom are elderly repeat offenders. Two men have admitted partial involvement, while others face various charges, including armed robbery and kidnapping. The high-profile trial, expected to run through this month, is drawing intense media attention, and Kardashian is expected to testify.
Ministers to amend data bill amid artists’ concerns over AI and copyright
The UK government has proposed concessions to its controversial copyright reform plans—allowing AI developers to use copyrighted works without permission unless creators opt out—in an effort to ease tensions with artists and gain support ahead of a critical parliamentary vote. These concessions include promises of an economic impact assessment and increased transparency, but they have been widely dismissed by critics as inadequate. Prominent creatives like Paul McCartney and Elton John argue that the reforms undermine artists’ rights, while campaigners and opposition parties, including the Liberal Democrats, are pushing for amendments requiring AI companies to comply with existing copyright laws. Critics accuse the government of prioritizing foreign tech interests over the UK’s creative industries.
Arts
Mellon Foundation Announces $15 Million for Humanities Councils
The Mellon Foundation announced $15 million in emergency funding for state humanities councils across the U.S. after the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) canceled most existing grants due to a shift toward President Trump’s priorities. This funding, while crucial, covers only a fraction of the $65 million the councils were set to receive from the NEH this year. The support aims to preserve humanities programs, particularly in rural areas lacking private philanthropic resources. The councils, which support projects such as literary events, historical sites, and local history initiatives, had been facing existential threats due to the loss of federal funding. The Mellon Foundation's contribution, which includes operational support and challenge grants, provides temporary relief as councils work on long-term solutions.
Detroit Opera Steps Into Trump’s Cross Hairs With ‘Central Park Five’
Detroit Opera is preparing to stage “The Central Park Five,” an opera about the wrongful conviction of five Black and Latino teens in 1989, at a time when Donald Trump—depicted as a central inflammatory figure in the production—is once again in the White House. Composed by Pulitzer Prize-winner Anthony Davis, the opera dramatizes the injustice the Exonerated Five suffered, including Trump’s real-life role in inciting public outrage through full-page ads calling for the death penalty. Despite fears of political backlash, including possible retaliation from the Trump administration—which has defunded cultural programs and challenged arts institutions—the production is moving forward with heightened security and strong board support. The creative team, cast, and leadership emphasize the importance of telling this story in the current climate, framing it as a necessary act of artistic courage and historical truth-telling amid efforts to erase narratives of racial injustice.
Citing National Institutes of Health Cuts, a Top Science Journal Stops Accepting Submissions
Environmental Health Perspectives, a leading, federally funded, open-access journal focused on the health effects of environmental toxins, has paused acceptance of new research submissions due to budget uncertainties following federal funding cuts. For over 50 years, the journal has made peer-reviewed research freely available to both readers and authors, providing crucial access to scientific findings without the financial barriers often associated with academic publishing. The suspension has alarmed public health experts and researchers, particularly given the Trump administration’s contradictory emphasis on transparency in science and environmental health. The move also comes amid broader scrutiny and political pressure on scientific journals, including threats of prosecution and accusations of bias, raising concerns about the future of independent, accessible science publishing.
Sports
Rob Manfred discussed Pete Rose with Donald Trump, says he’ll make ruling on reinstatement
MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred is reviewing a request to reinstate Pete Rose from the league’s ineligible list, a topic that came up during a meeting with Trump on April 16. Rose's family filed a petition for his posthumous reinstatement in January, and while Manfred did not specify when he would rule, he confirmed the issue was discussed with Trump, who had previously expressed interest in pardoning Rose. Rose, banned from baseball in 1989 for betting on the sport while managing the Cincinnati Reds, had previously applied for reinstatement in 1997 and 2015, with no success. In addition to the Rose discussion, Manfred and Trump also talked about the impact of immigration policies on foreign-born players.
Trump administration says Penn violated Title IX by allowing transgender swimmer
The Trump administration has accused the University of Pennsylvania of violating Title IX by allowing transgender swimmer Lia Thomas to compete on its women’s swim team, proposing that the school strip her of her 2022 national championship and apologize to female athletes whose records were allegedly impacted. The administration gave UPenn 10 days to resolve the issue or face potential legal action, following an executive order by Trump banning transgender athletes from competing in women’s sports unless assigned female at birth. The NCAA responded by updating its policy to align with the order, now restricting women’s sports to those assigned female at birth. Thomas, who transitioned in 2019 and met NCAA guidelines at the time, was later barred from Olympic competition under World Aquatics rules.
Newsletter, Image, Likeness Vol. 130: Mario Chalmers’ NIL Lawsuit Dismissal Signals Tough Road Ahead For Legacy Claims
On April 28th, U.S. District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer dismissed a lawsuit brought by former Kansas basketball star Mario Chalmers and 15 other ex-college athletes against the NCAA and six major conferences, ruling their antitrust and unjust enrichment claims over the historical use of their name, image, and likeness (NIL) were untimely and barred by previous cases like O’Bannon and Alston. The court found that the alleged anticompetitive acts occurred when the athletes signed Student-Athlete Statements before June 2016, not each time their NILs were later used, and rejected arguments for continuing violations or concealed practices. The decision highlights the legal challenges former athletes face in pursuing retroactive NIL compensation, especially those excluded from the House v. NCAA settlement, and sets a precedent likely to influence similar pending cases.
U.S. Olympic sprinter Fred Kerley charged with battery ahead of Grand Slam Track meet
U.S. Olympic sprinter Fred Kerley was arrested in Florida and charged with touch or strike battery after his ex-girlfriend alleged that he punched her in the face during an argument, causing her nose to bleed. The incident occurred at a hotel where athletes were staying ahead of the Grand Slam Track meet in Miami. Kerley’s attorney denied the allegation, claiming the arrest was made without a thorough investigation and expressing confidence that no charges will be filed. As a result of the arrest, Kerley will not compete in the upcoming meet. This marks his second recent legal issue, following a January arrest in Miami Beach.
Bruno Lage vs Eagle Football: The £6m lawsuit for the ‘job offer’ that never came
Manchester City’s chief executive, Ferran Soriano, has embraced the idea of "Disneyfication" in football, where clubs can leverage their brands like Disney does with its characters. This concept is behind the multi-club ownership model employed by City Football Group. However, a recent legal dispute has highlighted another potential advantage of such ownership models: managerial recruitment. Former Wolverhampton Wanderers manager Bruno Lage has filed a £6 million lawsuit against Eagle Football, claiming that it failed to honor a promise of future employment at Crystal Palace or Lyon after he took a 6-month managerial contract at Botafogo, one of its clubs. The legal issue centers on whether such promises in multi-club ownership agreements are enforceable. Eagle Football has disputed the claim, asserting that Lage's resignation from Botafogo breached his contract and is defending itself against the lawsuit, which could set a precedent for similar cases in the future.
Canadian hockey player Matt Petgrave will not face criminal charges over death of Adam Johnson
Matt Petgrave, a Canadian hockey player, will not face criminal charges in relation to the death of former NHL player Adam Johnson during a match in October 2023. Johnson, 29, tragically died after being cut in the neck by a skate during a game between the Sheffield Steelers and the Nottingham Panthers. Petgrave was arrested on suspicion of manslaughter in November 2023, but after a year-long investigation, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) concluded that there was no realistic prospect of conviction and decided against bringing charges. The CPS and South Yorkshire Police worked closely together, consulting experts and reviewing evidence, but ultimately determined that the incident was a tragic accident. Johnson's death left a lasting impact on the ice hockey community, and Petgrave has been awaiting the outcome of the investigation while facing legal costs.
Media/Technology
Trump Signs Executive Order Seeking to End Federal Funding for NPR and PBS, NPR and PBS Vow to Fight
Trump signed an executive order aiming to cut federal funding for NPR and PBS, accusing them of producing biased, "left-wing propaganda." The order directs the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) to reduce federal support for these broadcasters, though the impact may be limited due to CPB’s private status and advance funding. NPR and PBS strongly opposed the move, with their leaders defending their editorial independence and warning that the loss of federal funds would severely impact public broadcasting services across the U.S. The Trump administration's criticism of the broadcasters' coverage, particularly on issues like COVID-19 and Hunter Biden, has led to increased tension, with NPR and PBS exploring legal options to protect their funding and operations.
Corporation for Public Broadcasting Sues White House to Block Board Firings
The CPB filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, accusing it of unlawfully firing three of its board members via email without justification. The CPB, a private organization created by Congress, argued that Trump did not have the authority to remove directors from its board, which operates independently from the federal government. The lawsuit sought to block the firings and prevent further interference with CPB's governance. The court temporarily halted the dismissals pending a hearing. This legal action highlights ongoing tensions between Republicans and public media, as conservatives have long criticized CPB-funded outlets like PBS and NPR for alleged liberal bias and pushed for the defunding of public media.
Judge Rebukes Apple and Orders It to Loosen Grip on App Store
In a major blow to Apple, a federal judge ruled that the tech giant must stop collecting commissions on external app sales and loosen its control over the App Store, following a five-year antitrust battle with Epic Games. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers found Apple in contempt for circumventing a previous order by creating a 27% fee and using scare tactics to dissuade users from paying developers directly, despite being told to allow alternative payment links. She criticized Apple CEO Tim Cook and other executives for misleading the court and referred the company for possible criminal contempt. The ruling is a significant win for Epic and could reshape the app economy by empowering developers and reducing Apple’s lucrative fees. Apple plans to appeal.
In Leak Crackdown, Bondi Rolls Back 2013 Protection Stemming From Fox News Case
Attorney General Pam Bondi has reversed key protections for journalists in leak investigations, easing restrictions on the Justice Department’s ability to seize news gathering records using court orders, subpoenas, and search warrants. The change rolls back rules implemented after the 2013 controversy in which the FBI labeled a Fox News reporter as a criminal to obtain his emails, sparking bipartisan outrage and reforms. Bondi’s revision not only ends a 2021 ban on such tactics but also quietly removes a safeguard that had prevented investigators from exploiting a legal loophole in the Privacy Protection Act of 1980. Press freedom advocates warn the move revives the risk of government overreach and undermines the First Amendment, raising fears of renewed efforts to intimidate journalists and stifle investigative reporting.
Google’s Chief Says Breakup Proposal Would Hobble Business
Google CEO Sundar Pichai testified in federal court that the U.S. government's proposed solutions to address the company's search engine monopoly would harm innovation. Pichai argued that the remedies, such as forcing Google to sell its Chrome browser and share data with competitors, would make it difficult for the company to invest in research and development, ultimately stifling technological progress. He contended that the forced sharing of Google’s search data would allow rivals to reverse-engineer its technology, undermining its intellectual property. The case, which could reshape Silicon Valley’s power dynamics, centers on whether Google's dominance in online search, facilitated by deals with companies like Apple and Samsung, constitutes illegal monopolistic behavior.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/30/technology/google-ceo-antitrust-trial.html?searchResultPosition=1
Judge Orders Trump Officials to Disburse Funding for Radio Free Europe
A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to release $12 million in congressionally approved funds to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), a U.S.-funded independent news organization that had been financially crippled after the administration withheld its grant money. The judge, Royce C. Lamberth, emphasized that both Congress and Trump had authorized the funding and that the executive branch could not unilaterally defund the outlet or impose illegal conditions on its operation. RFE/RL, which delivers independent reporting in countries with restricted press freedom, had been forced to furlough staff and cut services due to the funding delay. The administration’s actions, seen by critics as an attempt to assert editorial control over the outlet, are part of broader efforts to restrict other federally funded media organizations. Judge Lamberth rejected claims that the judiciary was overstepping its bounds, underscoring the courts’ role in upholding constitutional separation of powers.
White House-Amazon Spat Culminates in Trump Calling Bezos ‘Very Nice’
The White House, represented by press secretary Karoline Leavitt, criticized Amazon after a report suggested the company might start displaying tariff-related price increases alongside products, potentially highlighting how American consumers were absorbing the costs of Trump administration tariffs. Although Amazon denied this claim, explaining that such a policy was never approved, Leavitt seized on the opportunity to accuse the company of being "hostile and political." This public feud between the White House and Amazon is noteworthy, given Jeff Bezos' previous efforts to maintain a favorable relationship with the Trump administration, including financial support and strategic media moves. Despite this, Leavitt questioned Amazon's actions, particularly why similar disclosures weren't made during the Biden administration’s inflationary price hikes.
‘60 Minutes’ Chastises Its Corporate Parent in Unusual On-Air Rebuke
In a rare public rebuke, “60 Minutes” correspondent Scott Pelley used the program’s April 27th broadcast to criticize CBS parent company Paramount for increasing oversight of the show’s content, following the abrupt resignation of executive producer Bill Owens. Pelley stated that although no stories were blocked, Owens felt Paramount’s interference compromised journalistic independence, prompting his departure to protect the show’s integrity. The tension comes as Paramount seeks Trump administration approval for a major merger, amid ongoing litigation from Trump over a past “60 Minutes” interview. The episode marked a significant moment in the show's history, drawing parallels to past corporate interference, and included a segment critical of recent Trump administration policy decisions.
Report: over 1.5m Americans now work as ‘digital creators’
The Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) has released new data showing that the U.S. creator economy has grown significantly, with over 1.5 million Americans now working full-time as digital creators—a nearly eightfold increase since 2020. These creators, including social media influencers, make up more than 1 in 10 internet-dependent jobs, contributing to the broader digital sector that now employs over 28.4 million people, up from just 3 million in 2008. Notably, the creator sector is expanding at a rate 5 times faster than the traditional media industry.
TikTok Fined $600 Million for Sending European User Data to China
TikTok was fined €530 million ($600 million) by the Irish Data Protection Commission for violating the European Union’s data privacy laws by improperly transferring users' personal data to China. The investigation revealed that TikTok failed to protect European users' data, with some information accessible to staff in China, potentially exposing it to the Chinese government under its surveillance laws. This fine is one of the largest under the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). TikTok, which has about 175 million users in Europe, plans to appeal the decision, arguing that it complies with EU laws and highlighting its 2023 initiative to safeguard data within the EU. The ruling adds to the company's legal challenges, including pressure from the U.S. to divest from China.
General News
100 Days – How Trump’s Second Term is Changing the Executive Branch
In his second term, Trump has aggressively pursued a transformative agenda across domestic, economic, and foreign policy, creating significant disruption and controversy. His actions, ranging from challenging judicial authority to defying international norms, have sparked both backlash and rapid reversals. Domestically, Trump has implemented sweeping immigration measures, undermined federal agencies, and used his presidency to exact personal retribution against perceived enemies. On the international front, he has abandoned traditional diplomacy in favor of raw power politics, particularly with Russia and China, while attempting to assert American dominance in global trade through tariffs. Meanwhile, his policies have induced economic uncertainty, prompting fears of a recession, and his imperialistic rhetoric about acquiring territories like Greenland and Canada reflects a revival of "Manifest Destiny." Overall, Trump's presidency has been marked by bold, controversial moves aimed at reshaping America’s global and domestic standing.
Trump Proposes $163 Billion in Cuts Across Government in New Budget
Trump’s proposed 2025 budget calls for $163 billion in cuts to federal spending, targeting a wide range of domestic programs including education, health, housing, and climate initiatives—many of which benefit low-income Americans—while dramatically increasing funding for defense and homeland security. The proposal seeks to shrink nondefense discretionary spending to its lowest share of GDP since the 1960s and includes plans to eliminate or reduce aid programs like rental and heating assistance. While some Republicans support the plan, others joined Democrats in criticizing it as harmful to vulnerable populations. The budget also advances Trump’s broader vision of downsizing government and prioritizing military and immigration enforcement, all while proposing costly tax cuts and maintaining silence on key fiscal issues such as Social Security and the national debt.
Supreme Court Considers Suit Over F.B.I.’s Raid of the Wrong House
The Supreme Court is considering a case involving an FBI raid on the wrong home in Atlanta, where agents, acting on a faulty GPS, broke down the wrong door, used a flash-bang grenade, and arrested the couple inside. The couple sued for false arrest, assault, and battery, but lower courts dismissed the case, citing government immunity. During oral arguments, several justices expressed disbelief at the government's defense, questioning why the agents didn't take basic precautions, like verifying the address. The government argued that the agents made a reasonable mistake, while plaintiffs contended that the raid violated the policy of ensuring the correct address. The case could lead to a ruling that sends the matter back to lower courts for further consideration.
Justices Appear Skeptical of School District in Student Disability Rights Case
The Supreme Court is hearing a case involving the Osseo Area School District in Minnesota, which is accused of failing to provide adequate accommodations for a student with severe epilepsy, Ava Tharpe. The legal question revolves around whether the school district should be required to prove it acted in "bad faith" to defend itself against the discrimination claim or whether a lower standard, such as "deliberate indifference," should apply. Disability rights groups have expressed concerns that the school district's argument for a higher standard could significantly undermine protections for people with disabilities. The case could have far-reaching implications beyond schools, potentially changing the legal standard for all disability rights cases under federal law. The justices appeared skeptical of the school district’s position during oral arguments, with some questioning the potential broad impact of adopting the "bad faith" standard.
Attacks on Judges Undermine Democracy, Warns Justice Jackson
At a judicial conference in Puerto Rico, Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson condemned the increasing attacks on judges, which she said are designed to intimidate and influence their decisions. She highlighted the rise in threats of physical violence and professional retaliation against judges, particularly those who have ruled against Trump or his allies. Justice Jackson warned that such attacks undermine the rule of law and judicial independence, stressing that a society where judges fear for their safety due to their rulings has strayed from democratic norms. She also reaffirmed the importance of an independent judiciary in maintaining a free and fair society, marking her comments on National Law Day.
Lawsuit Challenges Policy Allowing Immigration Action in Churches and Schools
A coalition of immigrant rights groups, including the Justice Action Center and Innovation Law Lab, has filed a lawsuit in Oregon challenging the Trump administration’s reinstated policy allowing immigration enforcement in sensitive locations such as schools, churches, and community centers. The suit seeks to reinstate protections from the Biden era that barred such operations in civic spaces, arguing that the Trump policy violates constitutional and religious freedoms. Prompted by a wave of aggressive deportations—including the removal of children and the transfer of migrants to facilities like Guantánamo Bay and El Salvador’s CECOT prison—the lawsuit reflects growing concern over the chilling effect on public life and religious participation. Previous legal challenges have met limited success, but advocates argue that the intensified enforcement tactics now provide stronger grounds for judicial intervention.
Hawaii Announced a Climate Lawsuit. So the Government Sued Hawaii First.
In an unprecedented legal move, the Trump administration has preemptively sued Hawaii and Michigan to block them from filing climate change lawsuits against fossil fuel companies, arguing that only the federal government has authority over national energy policy. The administration's actions follow Trump’s executive order condemning state-level climate litigation as a threat to national security and energy independence. Critics, including legal scholars and state officials, denounced the lawsuits as legally unsound and politically motivated, with Hawaii and Michigan pushing back strongly. Hawaii proceeded with its lawsuit against energy companies, citing climate damages like the devastating 2023 Maui wildfires. The Justice Department also sued New York and Vermont over newly enacted “climate superfund” laws, intensifying the broader clash between state-led climate accountability efforts and federal attempts to protect the fossil fuel industry.
Trump Recasts Mission of Justice Dept.’s Civil Rights Office, Prompting ‘Exodus’
Hundreds of lawyers and staff members are leaving the U.S. Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, driven out by the Trump administration's shift in priorities, which now focuses on cases targeting liberal cities, universities, and policies like transgender rights, rather than protecting marginalized communities. The administration's reopening of the "deferred resignation program" is accelerating these departures, with over 100 lawyers expected to resign by the deadline. This dramatic reduction in staff follows political appointees' efforts to refocus the division's mission on conservative agendas, including investigating antisemitism in universities and challenging diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. The changes have led to concerns about a rollback of civil rights protections and the abandonment of longstanding cases involving police reform and voter discrimination.
Appeals Court Temporarily Blocks Mass Firings at Consumer Bureau
A panel of appellate judges ruled 2-to-1 to restore a district court's injunction that temporarily prevents the Trump administration from laying off 90% of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's (CFPB) staff. This follows attempts by Russell T. Vought, acting director of the bureau, to dismiss nearly 1,500 employees, arguing the agency was "woke and weaponized." The district court had initially blocked the layoffs, deeming them illegal, and after the appeals court threw out part of the ruling, Vought’s team moved to fire workers again. The court's decision to uphold the temporary ban on layoffs ensures that the case will be further examined in mid-May, allowing union representatives and other parties involved to argue for the bureau’s continued operation.
Justice Dept. Firings Prompt a Torrent of Legal Fights
The Trump administration's mass firings, particularly within the Justice Department, have led to an overwhelming number of legal cases challenging the dismissals of senior career officials. These employees, including federal prosecutors and senior department staff, are appealing their firings to administrative judges at the Merit Systems Protection Board. The appeals, which are expected to exceed 10,000 this year, highlight concerns that the dismissals are politically motivated and violate civil service protections. Notable cases include the firing of Elizabeth G. Oyer, who claims she was dismissed for resisting pressure to restore gun rights to Mel Gibson, and Adam Schleifer, a prosecutor fired without explanation after facing partisan criticism. These cases could have significant consequences for the Justice Department and the federal government’s ability to maintain a neutral, non-partisan civil service.
Federal Judge Strikes Down Trump’s Use of Alien Enemies Act to Deport Venezuelans
A federal judge in Texas, Fernando Rodriguez Jr., permanently blocked the Trump administration from using the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) to deport Venezuelans, ruling that the law, a wartime statute from 1798, was being misapplied in the current context. The administration had invoked the AEA to target Venezuelans allegedly linked to the Tren de Aragua gang, claiming the situation constituted an "invasion." However, Rodriguez determined that the terms of the act, such as "invasion" and "predatory incursion," refer to military actions and do not apply to the activities of a street gang. This decision builds on ongoing legal challenges and may impact future cases involving the use of the AEA for immigration purposes. The ruling prevents the government from using the law to detain or deport Venezuelans in the Southern District of Texas.
Trump Moves Waltz to U.N. and Names Rubio Interim National Security Adviser
Trump made a significant personnel change by removing his national security adviser, Michael Waltz, and nominating him as the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. This is the first major shake-up of top White House aides during Trump’s second term, a period where he has largely avoided such upheavals. Waltz's departure follows criticism over a sensitive military operation leak and his ideological clash with the president’s preference for a less interventionist foreign policy. Secretary of State Marco Rubio will temporarily take over Waltz's role as national security adviser while continuing his duties at the State Department. The move comes amid internal conflicts and external pressure, including calls for Waltz’s removal from Trump’s allies, marking a pivotal moment in the president’s foreign policy direction.
Republicans in Congress Use Obscure Law to Roll Back Biden-Era Regulations
Republicans in Congress, capitalizing on their control of both chambers and the presidency, are aggressively using the obscure Congressional Review Act (CRA) to roll back Biden-era regulations, bypassing the Senate filibuster with simple majority votes. While originally intended to reverse recent federal rules, the GOP is now testing its limits by targeting state-level regulations approved by federal agencies, such as California’s air pollution standards. This approach risks undermining the filibuster and expanding congressional authority over executive actions, with Senator John Thune facing pressure on whether to override the Senate parliamentarian. Critics, including Democrats and legal experts, warn that this could set a dangerous precedent, weakening checks and balances and leaving future administrations vulnerable to political retaliation.
Trump Administration Slashes Research Into L.G.B.T.Q. Health
The Trump administration has canceled over $800 million in NIH-funded medical research, nearly half of which focused on the health of LGBTQ individuals. These terminated studies, many targeting HIV, cancer, mental health, and other conditions that disproportionately affect sexual and gender minority groups, were deemed no longer aligned with the administration's priorities, often citing opposition to "gender ideology." The move has significantly disrupted public health research infrastructure, led to job losses in LGBTQ-focused labs, and threatens efforts to combat rising sexually transmitted infections and mental health issues in vulnerable populations. Critics, including scientists and civil rights advocates, view the cuts as ideologically driven and scientifically harmful, with potential legal challenges underway.
Trump Administration Cancels $1 Billion in Grants for Student Mental Health
The Trump administration has halted $1 billion in mental health funding for children that was authorized under the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act following the 2022 Uvalde school shooting, citing concerns that some programs used race-conscious hiring and training practices. The funding, which was part of a rare bipartisan effort to address school gun violence by improving student mental health services, was cut by the Education Department, which claimed the grant programs potentially violated federal civil rights laws—though no specific law or evidence was cited. Critics, including Senator Chris Murphy, accused the administration of illegally undermining a congressional mandate, while conservatives like Christopher Rufo praised the move as a rejection of “left-wing racialism.” Education advocates warned that canceling the grants threatens student safety and mental health, especially in underserved communities.
After Federal Cuts, Food Banks Scrouge and Scrimp
In Charleston, West Virginia—one of the nation's poorest areas—charities like Trinity’s Table are struggling to feed vulnerable populations after the Trump administration cut $1 billion in federal food aid previously expanded during the Biden era. This has left organizations scrambling to make meals from limited, often mismatched USDA supplies like dried cranberries and canned soup. Leaders like Sara Busse have resorted to using their own funds and church donations to fill the gap, serving hundreds of meals weekly to seniors, children, and women in shelters. With food banks receiving fewer and less useful shipments, and local farmers like Aaron Simon suffering revenue losses from canceled government contracts, the cuts are severely weakening an already fragile safety net in Appalachia. The situation is dire enough that a truck crash of Cheez-Its was seen as a blessing, underscoring how desperate and makeshift food aid has become.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/28/us/politics/food-banks-trump-cuts-aid.html?searchResultPosition=1
Federal Watchdog Reveals Dozens of Inquiries Into Trump’s Withholding of Funds
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has opened 39 investigations into the Trump administration's possible illegal withholding of billions in congressionally approved funds, which could lead to a constitutional clash over presidential powers. The investigations stem from concerns that Trump blocked or slowed funds for programs in areas like foreign aid, green energy, and health during his first 100 days in office, potentially violating the Constitution’s allocation of spending powers to Congress. The GAO is scrutinizing the Education Department, EPA, and other agencies, and its findings could prompt legal action against the administration. The issue centers on Trump's use of impoundment power to withhold funds. These developments have sparked tensions with congressional Democrats, who estimate that over $430 billion was affected, and could result in a legal showdown as Trump prepares to propose further cuts in his 2026 budget.
Secret Deals, Foreign Investments, Presidential Policy Changes: The Rise of Trump’s Crypto Firm
Trump and his family have entangled themselves in the cryptocurrency world through a company called World Liberty Financial, leveraging his presidency and name to secure lucrative deals and millions in sales. Founded with partners of questionable backgrounds, the firm used the Trump brand to solicit multi-million-dollar payments from other crypto firms in exchange for partnerships, some of which were rejected as unethical. Despite early skepticism of crypto, Trump has shifted his stance and now promotes the industry aggressively while enacting policies that benefit it — and his company — raising unprecedented conflicts of interest. With Trump's family owning the majority of World Liberty and reaping significant financial benefits, the venture blurs the line between private business and presidential power in ways that challenge longstanding ethical norms.
Torture and Secret C.I.A. Prisons Haunt 9/11 Case in Judge’s Ruling
A military judge has ruled that Ammar al-Baluchi’s confession in the September 11th case, in which he is accused of aiding the hijackers, should be thrown out due to the use of torture by the CIA, including sleep deprivation and beatings. The judge also cited the prolonged isolation and continued questioning of Baluchi for years after his physical torture ended as part of the issue. Baluchi, who was detained in CIA black sites for years before being transferred to Guantánamo, had been subjected to harsh interrogation techniques meant to condition him for future compliance. This ruling marks another blow to the government's efforts to conduct death penalty trials at Guantánamo, with prosecutors planning to appeal. The decision follows a similar one earlier this year in the U.S.S. Cole case, reinforcing the ongoing legal challenges related to torture-derived evidence in military tribunals.
Trump Grants Carmakers Some Relief From His Punishing Tariffs
Trump signed two executive orders that offer some relief to automakers by reducing certain tariffs on imported cars and parts, which had previously raised production costs and threatened the financial stability of companies like Ford and General Motors. The orders exempt carmakers from additional levies on imports, such as those on steel and aluminum, and provide a phased tariff relief on imported components used in cars assembled in the U.S., though this benefit will be reduced over the next 2 years. Despite these adjustments, the 25% tariff on imported vehicles and parts remains in place, continuing to raise car prices and affect the industry. Automakers have welcomed the concessions, but they argue that the time frame is insufficient to restructure operations and mitigate higher costs, leading to concerns about long-term financial challenges.
Behind Trump’s Deal to Deport Venezuelans to El Salvador’s Most Feared Prison
In a controversial move, the Trump administration deported 238 migrants—mostly Venezuelans—to a maximum-security prison in El Salvador under the rarely used Alien Enemies Act, treating them as foreign enemies without due process. Although publicly aligned with President Trump, Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele privately raised concerns about accepting individuals without verified criminal backgrounds, requesting evidence they were members of the gang Tren de Aragua. The rushed operation, led by Stephen Miller and intended to symbolize Trump's tough stance on immigration, included mistakes such as deporting women to an all-male prison. Families of detainees are now struggling to find information about their loved ones, while legal battles loom over the constitutionality of the mass deportations, potentially setting a precedent for expanded executive power.
Judge Temporarily Blocks Border Patrol’s Stop-and-Arrest Tactics in California
In January, Border Patrol agents conducted a sweep in California’s Central Valley, arresting 78 individuals, mostly farm workers and day laborers, as part of “Operation Return to Sender.” Though officials claimed the operation targeted undocumented immigrants with serious criminal records, public data showed 77 of those arrested had no prior criminal or immigration history. Lawyers argued the arrests were racially motivated and unconstitutional, prompting a federal judge to issue a preliminary injunction blocking Border Patrol from stopping individuals without reasonable suspicion or making warrantless arrests without probable cause. The ruling, seen as a rebuke of the Trump administration’s aggressive deportation tactics, reinforces constitutional protections against discriminatory enforcement.
On California’s State Bar Exam, More Questions Than Answers
The February 2025 California bar exam has been marred by a series of significant issues, including technical failures with testing software, questionable multiple-choice questions developed using artificial intelligence without proper oversight, and now a likely delay in the release of exam results. Test-takers faced repeated disruptions during the exam and expressed outrage over the state bar's lack of transparency and accountability, fueling widespread frustration, online backlash, and talk of protests. The State Bar of California, which had restructured the exam in a cost-cutting move, now faces scrutiny from the California Supreme Court and legal experts, especially after it was revealed that AI-generated questions were used without prior approval or review. The bar is now seeking approval to adjust scores to account for the problems, but many future lawyers remain in limbo, with their careers and finances hanging in the balance.
Columbia Student Who Was Arrested at Citizenship Interview Is Freed
Mohsen Mahdawi, a pro-Palestinian organizer at Columbia University, was released from federal custody after being detained by immigration officials who sought to rescind his green card as part of a crackdown on student protests. The Trump administration had argued that Mahdawi's activism could harm U.S. foreign policy, accusing him of promoting antisemitism, although no evidence was provided. Judge Geoffrey W. Crawford of Federal District Court in Vermont granted Mahdawi's release, citing his strong community ties and peaceful character, while drawing comparisons to McCarthyism. Though his case is ongoing, Mahdawi's release allows him to continue challenging the deportation attempt outside of detention. The case highlights growing tensions surrounding the U.S. government's response to protest movements and the treatment of noncitizen activists.
States Sue After AmeriCorps Cuts Leave Communities Scrambling
The Trump administration's drastic cuts to AmeriCorps have triggered a lawsuit from over 20 states, accusing the administration of unlawfully dismantling the agency. These cuts, which include the termination of nearly $400 million in grants, threaten to shut down over 1,000 community service programs and disrupt the work of more than 32,000 AmeriCorps members. The cuts impact a variety of vital services, including education, anti-poverty efforts, and disaster recovery programs, especially in rural and underserved areas. The decision, which has drawn bipartisan criticism, has left many organizations and volunteers in uncertainty, with some service members receiving no notice or compensation for the abrupt termination of their roles. The lawsuit claims the cuts violate the law and harm communities across the country.
Companies Are Serving Notice: We’re Raising Prices Because of Tariffs
Trump's trade policies, particularly his tariffs on imports from China, are causing higher prices for American consumers on products like strollers, power tools, and cookware. Companies are being forced to raise prices due to increased import costs, with some even pausing orders from China or discontinuing products. For example, Stanley Black & Decker and Procter & Gamble have already increased or plan to increase prices. The tariffs have also impacted e-commerce platforms like Temu, leading to higher costs for consumers. While some hoped the tariffs would bring long-term benefits, many Americans are frustrated by the immediate burden on their household budgets and are questioning whether the promised benefits will materialize.
Harvard’s Trick for Fighting Trump? A Deep Bench of Conservative Lawyers.
Harvard University has hired a team of conservative-leaning lawyers, including former clerks for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and advisers to the Trump Organization, to challenge the Trump administration in a lawsuit over the potential loss of billions in federal funding. This marks a shift from Harvard’s previous legal strategy in 2022, where it worked with WilmerHale for its affirmative action defense. The university argues that the administration's demands violate the First Amendment and the Administrative Procedure Act. By selecting a team of prominent conservative lawyers, Harvard aims to appeal to a Supreme Court with a Republican-appointed supermajority, signaling that the case is about defending academic freedom rather than liberal versus conservative politics. However, this strategy carries risks, as some lawyers on the team have been linked to partisan political figures and could face backlash.
In Suits and Ties, Lawyers Protest Trump’s Attacks on the Legal System
On May 1st, approximately 1,500 lawyers and legal professionals gathered in Foley Square, New York, as part of the National Law Day of Action to protest Trump's attacks on the judiciary and the legal system. The rally, part of a nationwide movement with over 50 similar events, was sparked by concerns over Trump's efforts to undermine the rule of law, including targeting law firms, threatening judges, and pushing unconstitutional executive orders. Demonstrators, many in business attire, chanted in support of judicial independence and recited the Pledge of Allegiance, emphasizing the importance of an impartial legal system. The protests reflected growing dissatisfaction among lawyers who feel morally compelled to stand up against what they view as a direct threat to their profession and democratic values.
Orders to Investigate Columbia Protesters Raised Alarms in Justice Dept.
A senior Justice Department official, Emil Bove III, initiated a controversial investigation into student protesters at Columbia University, focusing on activists who opposed Israel's actions in Gaza. This move, seen as politically motivated by many career prosecutors, led to internal conflict within the department. Prosecutors pushed back against Bove's orders to obtain membership lists and search social media accounts of the activists, fearing violations of First Amendment rights and potential political intimidation. A federal magistrate judge rejected a request for a search warrant, and the investigation ultimately stalled. This episode highlighted tensions within the Justice Department, as political appointees sought to pursue Trump's agenda while career officials raised concerns about legal and ethical boundaries. The case also fueled broader criticisms of the administration's crackdown on campus protests, with accusations of conflating anti-Israel sentiment with antisemitism.
Kennedy Orders Search for New Measles Treatments Instead of Urging Vaccination
As the United States faces its largest measles outbreak in 25 years, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has directed federal health agencies to explore new treatments for the disease, including vitamins, despite the well-established effectiveness of the M.M.R. vaccine in preventing measles. Critics argue that focusing on untested treatments, such as cod liver oil, undermines public confidence in vaccines, which have proven to be 97% effective. Public health experts warn that this approach could lead people to believe vaccination is unnecessary, worsening the outbreak. While Kennedy has made inconsistent statements about the M.M.R. vaccine, some doctors report that his promotion of alternative treatments has caused delays in seeking proper medical care, further complicating the crisis.
Trump Fires Biden Appointees, Including Doug Emhoff, From Holocaust Museum
The Trump administration has begun removing several appointees from the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum’s governing board, including prominent figures such as Douglas Emhoff, the husband of former Vice President Kamala Harris, and other senior Biden officials. Emhoff, a Jewish advocate against antisemitism, expressed disappointment in his removal, emphasizing the importance of nonpartisan Holocaust education. Other dismissed members include Ron Klain, Tom Perez, Susan Rice, and Anthony Bernal. Critics, including former officials and organizations like the Anti-Defamation League, have raised concerns that politicizing the museum risks undermining its mission. The removals come shortly after Holocaust Remembrance Day and at a time when many American Jews are wary of political exploitation of antisemitism.
N.Y. Budget Deal Includes School Cellphone Ban and Public Safety Changes
Governor Kathy Hochul announced a $254 billion state budget agreement in New York that resolves several contentious issues, including measures to improve public safety, mental health treatment, and criminal justice. The budget includes tax credits, such as a child tax credit of up to $1,000 for families with children under age 4, although the proposed $3 billion tax refund was scaled back. The agreement also includes changes to the state’s payroll taxes, benefiting both large and small employers, and allocates significant funds for infrastructure projects like the MTA's $68 billion 5-year plan. Hochul’s push to limit mask-wearing in public spaces was watered down due to concerns over civil liberties, and the deal also introduces adjustments to campaign finance laws. While the budget addresses current fiscal needs, concerns over potential future federal budget cuts remain, and a special session may be required later in the year.
New York Bans Smartphones in Schools, Joining National Movement
New York Governor Kathy Hochul has announced a statewide ban on smartphones and other internet-enabled personal devices in schools, aiming to reduce distractions, cyberbullying, and compulsive social media use among students. The policy, which will apply to students from kindergarten through 12th grade, mandates that districts create plans to store and restrict phones during school hours. This move is part of a broader national trend to address the negative effects of an "always online" youth culture, such as increased rates of depression and anxiety. Although the ban has strong support from child advocacy groups and teachers' unions, it has faced some criticism, with concerns over students' ability to contact parents in emergencies and the potential for increased surveillance. The ban will be implemented by the start of the next school year, with state funding available to assist districts in purchasing necessary storage equipment.
A ‘Citizen Lawyer’ Gets a Standing Ovation at the Supreme Court
In a rare and emotional moment at the U.S. Supreme Court, all of the justices gave a standing ovation to Edwin S. Kneedler, the retiring deputy solicitor general, after his 160th and final oral argument—setting a modern record. Kneedler, praised for his integrity, nonpartisan dedication, and deep legal expertise, served in the Office of the Solicitor General since 1979 under multiple administrations. His career was widely celebrated by legal peers across the political spectrum, especially in contrast to recent criticisms of partisan and dishonest legal tactics in the second Trump administration. Chief Justice John Roberts and former solicitors general lauded Kneedler as a model public servant who embodied the highest standards of government lawyering, committed not just to winning cases but to upholding the rule of law.
Mark Carney Wins New Term as Canada’s Prime Minister on Anti-Trump Platform
In a dramatic and high-stakes election shaped by Trump's antagonistic stance toward Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney secured a new term for the Liberal Party, signaling a political shift driven by Canadian resistance to American pressure. Carney, a first-time candidate but seasoned economist, campaigned on a platform of defiance against Trump’s aggressive policies—including tariffs and threats to annex Canada—which ultimately helped the Liberals overtake a long-leading Conservative Party. Opposition leader Pierre Poilievre suffered a crushing defeat, even losing his seat after 20 years. The election was widely seen as a referendum on Trump’s influence and marked a stunning political comeback for the Liberals amid economic and geopolitical uncertainty.
Saudi Arabia and Qatar to Pay Off Syria’s Debt to the World Bank
Saudi Arabia and Qatar have agreed to pay Syria's $15 million debt to the World Bank, which will enable the bank to resume its support and assist the Syrian government in rebuilding the country's economy, devastated by years of civil war. This payment opens the door for Syria to access vital funds and technical support to restore its institutions and accelerate development. The move, praised by the Syrian government, comes as the country faces significant challenges, including widespread poverty, unemployment, and a collapsed currency. Despite some easing of Western sanctions, the new Syrian government, led by rebel groups that ousted Bashar al-Assad, still struggles with a difficult economic situation and international skepticism regarding its leadership and policies.
Comments