Week In Review
- Elissa D. Hecker - Editor
- Jun 17
- 26 min read
By Celine Agard
Edited by Elissa D. Hecker
Entertainment
Disney and Universal Sue A.I. Firm for Copyright Infringement
Disney and Universal have filed a landmark copyright infringement lawsuit against Midjourney, marking the first time major Hollywood studios have taken legal action over AI-generated images. The studios allege that Midjourney, a popular AI image generator, unlawfully used their copyrighted characters—such as Darth Vader, Elsa, Shrek, and Homer Simpson—to train its software and create images that blatantly copy protected content. While Disney and Universal acknowledge the potential of AI to enhance creativity, they argue that using copyrighted works without permission constitutes piracy and undermines the U.S. copyright system that supports millions of jobs in the entertainment industry. The lawsuit seeks damages and an injunction to prevent Midjourney from launching a video service without proper copyright protections, signaling a broader warning to AI companies that exploit creative works without authorization.
Judge Dismisses Justin Baldoni’s Suit Against Blake Lively and New York Times
A federal judge dismissed actor Justin Baldoni’s $400 million lawsuit against Blake Lively, her husband Ryan Reynolds, and The New York Times, in which Baldoni accused them of defamation, sexual harassment allegations, and a smear campaign tied to the film It Ends With Us. The judge ruled that Baldoni failed to prove extortion or defamation, noting that Lively’s statements were legally protected and The Times did not act with malice. The legal feud, which also involved claims of creative disputes and even touched on pop star Taylor Swift, continues as Lively’s own lawsuit against Baldoni proceeds.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/09/business/media/justin-baldoni-blake-lively-lawsuit-dismissed.html
Harvey Weinstein Convicted in Mixed Verdict After Retrial
Harvey Weinstein, the former Hollywood producer whose abuse allegations ignited the #MeToo movement, was convicted in Manhattan for a second time of a felony sex crime, specifically a criminal sexual act against Miriam Haley, while being acquitted on one charge and with jurors deadlocked on a third charge of third-degree rape involving Jessica Mann. The verdict followed days of heated jury deliberations and marked a partial win for prosecutors after Weinstein’s 2020 conviction was overturned due to procedural errors involving testimony about uncharged misconduct. The retrial featured the testimonies of three women—Haley, Mann, and Kaja Sokola—who accused Weinstein of sexually assaulting them between 2006 and 2013, though only one conviction was secured. Despite arguments by Weinstein’s defense that the women’s past communications and settlements undermined their credibility, the trial underscored his long-standing abuse of power in the entertainment industry. Weinstein now faces up to 25 years in prison for the conviction. The jury deadlocked on a third charge after deliberations devolved into threats and yelling, leading the judge to declare a mistrial on that remaining count. Manhattan’s district attorney pledged to retry Weinstein on the unresolved charge, which involves a third accuser.
The Question for the Sean Combs Jurors: What Qualifies as Coercion?
The jury in Sean Combs’s federal sex-trafficking and racketeering trial faces the complex task of determining whether two women, who were in long-term relationships with him, willingly participated in drug-fueled, voyeuristic sex sessions involving male escorts or were coerced victims of abuse and manipulation. Both women testified that although they initially consented, they complied with Combs’s demands out of fear, emotional pressure, and the threat of serious harm, describing a pattern of violence, intimidation, and trauma bonding. Combs denies all charges, emphasizing consent and pointing to messages showing affection and enthusiasm from the women. Expert testimony on coercive control and trauma bonding aims to help jurors understand why victims may stay in abusive relationships, a dynamic that complicates the case and highlights the difficulty in distinguishing consensual acts from coercion in intimate relationships involving power imbalance.
Arts
Smithsonian Museum Director Decides to Step Down
Kim Sajet, the director of the National Portrait Gallery, has announced her resignation following President Trump’s attempt to fire her, a move the Smithsonian Institution contested, citing its independent authority over personnel decisions. While Sajet did not address Trump directly in her statement, she emphasized stepping down was in the museum’s best interest. The White House criticized her as partisan for remarks on racial and gender inequality, sparking concerns about political interference in federally funded cultural institutions. Museum professionals warn that her departure may have a chilling effect on academic freedom and curatorial independence. Sajet, who significantly diversified the gallery’s representation of American identity during her tenure, was praised by colleagues and experts for her contributions. The Smithsonian’s Board of Regents affirmed its commitment to scholarship free from political influence and will appoint an acting director. Meanwhile, the Trump administration continues efforts to reshape cultural policy, including budget cuts and governance changes across national arts institutions.
In Challenge to Trump, Smithsonian Says It Controls Personnel Decisions
The Smithsonian, backed by its Board of Regents, emphasized its autonomy and commitment to nonpartisanship, challenging the president’s claims and actions, which many see as part of a broader effort to exert political control over cultural institutions. While the legality of Trump's attempt to dismiss Sajet is questionable, the situation has placed pressure on Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie Bunch, who is now tasked with preserving the institution's independence amid threats of budget cuts and political influence targeting exhibits and leadership.
A Night Out for Trump at the Theater, With a Pocket of Dissent
On the opening night of “Les Misérables” at the Kennedy Center, which coincided with Trump’s self-appointed takeover of the institution, the event highlighted both his supporters’ enthusiasm and visible opposition from critics. After purging the center’s traditionally bipartisan board and pledging to eliminate “drag shows” and what he called “anti-American propaganda,” Trump attended the show surrounded by loyalists, including cabinet members, and MAGA supporters. However, drag performers and dissenters also made their presence felt, symbolizing resistance to his administration’s cultural policies. The evening reflected tensions between Trump’s desire to assert control over the cultural venue and ongoing national protests against his policies, with moments of both cheers and boos during the event, underscoring the political and social divides permeating the occasion.
Stolen From Buddhist Monks, Sacred Painting Is Returned by Chicago Museum
After nearly 35 years, a sacred 18th-century Korean Buddhist painting, “Sinjungdo,” stolen from Bomunsa Temple in 1989, was discovered in the Smart Museum of Art’s collection at the University of Chicago. Listed under the wrong title and acquired in 2009 from a New York gallery with limited provenance documentation, the painting was returned to the Jogye Order of Korean Buddhism following a formal repatriation process initiated by South Korean officials in 2023. The emotional handover in November 2024 marked a powerful reunion, with monks kneeling in reverence upon seeing the long-lost artwork. The museum has since received a $2.45 million grant to strengthen provenance research and improve transparency in cultural stewardship. The case underscores broader calls for accountability in museum acquisitions and the significance of religious artifacts to their communities of origin.
Fulbright Board Resigns After Accusing Trump Aides of Political Interference
The entire board of the prestigious Fulbright program resigned in protest against what they called illegal political interference by the Trump administration’s State Department, which canceled nearly 200 scholarships for American professors and researchers primarily based on their research topics, including climate change and social issues. The board accused political appointees of undermining the program’s mission and violating congressional statutes by rejecting scholars already approved after a rigorous selection process, while also reviewing foreign scholars’ applications. This move reflects broader administration efforts to influence academic institutions ideologically, prompting bipartisan concern that the independence and quality of the Fulbright program, a cornerstone of U.S. educational exchange since 1946, are being compromised.
Sports
Podcaster Alex Cooper accuses former BU soccer coach Nancy Feldman of sexual harassment
Podcaster Alex Cooper, known for "Call Her Daddy," revealed in her new Hulu documentary "Call Her Alex" that she was sexually harassed by her Boston University soccer coach, Nancy Feldman, during her time as a player a decade ago. Cooper detailed how Feldman made inappropriate comments about her appearance and sex life, touched her thigh, and implied consequences if Cooper did not comply with her demands, which affected her playing time. Despite Cooper and her parents reporting the harassment to BU’s athletic administration, the school dismissed their concerns without investigation and refused to fire Feldman, though Cooper was allowed to keep her scholarship. Cooper said she did not play her senior year and expressed how the experience caused long-lasting emotional pain and shame, complicated by fears of retaliation and the fact her abuser was a woman. The documentary also suggests other women may have faced similar harassment by Feldman.
Athletes express concern over NCAA settlement’s impact on non-revenue sports
The recent $2.8 billion NCAA settlement approved by a federal judge promises to share revenue with college athletes, primarily benefiting high-revenue sports like football, but it raises serious concerns about the future of non-revenue sports and the overall student-athlete experience. Athletes like Sydney Moore and Sabrina Oostburg worry that while some will gain financially, many, especially women and those in less profitable sports, may face cuts to resources, facilities, and team opportunities. The settlement’s complexity and lack of clear communication have left many athletes and coaches confused about its impact, with questions also arising about roster limits and the status of walk-on players like Jake Rimmel, who was cut despite the case’s protections. The uncertainty highlights the challenges of balancing financial gains with preserving equitable support across all college sports.
New details emerge in Tyler Skaggs civil case; Wade Miley alleged to be early drug source
New court filings in the wrongful death lawsuit filed by the family of Angels pitcher Tyler Skaggs, who died from an overdose in 2019, reveal that Skaggs struggled with long-term drug addiction and reportedly obtained prescription pills from teammates, including pitcher Wade Miley. The Angels argue Skaggs’s own drug use makes him responsible for his death, while the family alleges that former Angels communications director Eric Kay, now imprisoned for his role in supplying drugs to Skaggs, was known within the organization to be abusing and distributing opioids. Testimonies from Kay’s ex-wife and team employees indicate that several Angels officials were aware of Kay’s drug problems, but failed to act sufficiently. The filings include thousands of pages of depositions and text messages, with both sides disputing knowledge and responsibility, as the family seeks $210 million in damages from the team.
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6419172/2025/06/12/tyler-skaggs-lawsuit-wade-miley-angels-eric-kay/
ICE’s go-to charter airline for deportations also flew NCAA teams, Inter Miami and more
Global Crossing Airlines (GlobalX), a Miami-based charter company known for transporting major college and professional sports teams, also operates more than half of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) deportation flights. The same planes that carry celebrated NCAA basketball teams, including during March Madness, are used to deport detained migrants who are restrained and confined under harsh conditions. While universities and sports organizations often remain unaware that the charters they use also serve ICE, human rights advocates criticize the airline’s dual role, highlighting the stark contrast between the luxury and excitement of sports charters and the severe, often inhumane treatment of deportees on the same aircraft. The airline’s involvement with deportations has drawn scrutiny amid concerns over ethics, transparency, and complicity.
Defense cites ‘reliability concerns’ of E.M. as closing arguments begin at Hockey Canada trial
In the Hockey Canada sexual assault trial, defense attorneys began closing arguments by attacking the credibility of the complainant, known as E.M., suggesting she altered her narrative to support a civil lawsuit she settled in 2022. Five players — Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dubé, and Cal Foote — have pleaded not guilty to charges stemming from a 2018 incident in a London, Ontario hotel. E.M. alleges she was sexually assaulted by multiple players over several hours after initially consenting to sex with McLeod. Defense attorney David Humphrey argued that E.M.’s testimony was inconsistent and shaped by regret and embarrassment, while highlighting texts and videos that allegedly indicated her consent. He emphasized the Crown failed to meet the burden of proof. Carter Hart’s lawyer, Megan Savard, portrayed Hart as a credible witness whose brief encounter with E.M. was consensual, and criticized the Crown for not challenging player testimonies about E.M.’s alleged sexual invitations, calling it unfair and suggesting E.M.’s behavior was later reframed as trauma rather than consent.
Media/Technology
Trump’s $1.1 Billion Public Broadcasting Clawback Faces Pushback in the Senate
A House-passed bill aiming to rescind $9 billion in previously approved federal spending—including $1.1 billion for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB)—is facing backlash from Republican senators concerned about its impact on rural and Native communities. The cuts threaten to eliminate crucial funding for NPR and PBS stations that serve as vital sources of news and emergency alerts, particularly in underserved and remote areas. Many Republican senators, including Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Mike Rounds of South Dakota, argue that defunding public broadcasting would harm their constituents, as these stations often provide essential communication in regions with limited access to internet or cellphone service. The bill is also drawing criticism over cuts to global aid programs like PEPFAR. While some Republicans supported the bill to reduce federal spending or due to concerns over perceived bias in public broadcasting, others broke ranks to oppose it, warning that the move would isolate vulnerable communities and weaken emergency communication infrastructure.
Fake Images and Conspiracy Theories Swirl Around L.A. Protests
Widespread disinformation on social media has intensified tensions surrounding recent protests in Los Angeles against immigration raids, with misleading images, videos, and conspiracy theories distorting the scale and nature of the unrest. False claims—such as staged violence, foreign influence, and organized plots by Democrats or George Soros—have been amplified by conservative influencers, inauthentic accounts, and even foreign actors like Russian-linked profiles. The misinformation has contributed to public confusion, fueled political narratives, and made it difficult to distinguish fact from fiction, further polarizing public opinion and undermining trust in the protests' legitimacy.
L.A. Protests Prompt Calls for Police Restraint After Journalist Injuries
During recent protests in Los Angeles, multiple journalists, including photojournalist Nick Stern, were struck by projectiles fired by law enforcement officers, leading to injuries and public outcry. Stern was hit in the thigh by a projectile allegedly fired by a Los Angeles County Sheriff’s deputy, requiring surgery and a lengthy recovery. Other reporters, including an Australian correspondent, were also targeted, with some hit on camera. Press freedom groups have condemned these actions, accusing police of deliberately targeting journalists and calling for safe conditions for media coverage. The LAPD and Sheriff’s Department are investigating the incidents, while federal agencies like Homeland Security have also been implicated but have not responded to inquiries. The controversy highlights tensions over press freedom and police conduct during protests.
FTC May Put Unusual Condition on Ad Mega-Merger: No Boycotting
The Federal Trade Commission is reviewing the proposed merger between two major advertising agencies, Omnicom Group and Interpublic Group, and is considering imposing conditions to prevent the combined company from refusing to place ads on platforms based on their political content. This move aligns with the Trump administration’s efforts to address perceived political bias in corporate America, particularly against conservative voices. The FTC’s potential consent decree would forbid boycotts of platforms for political reasons, amid broader investigations into advertisers withholding spending from politically charged social networks under the guise of “brand safety.” The merger, valued at about $25 billion in annual revenue, has drawn scrutiny from both Republicans and Democrats, reflecting the increasingly politicized environment around advertising and free speech in the industry.
Shaquille O’Neal Agrees to Pay $1.8 Million to Settle FTX Class-Action Suit
Shaquille O’Neal agreed to pay $1.8 million to settle a class-action lawsuit filed by customers of the collapsed cryptocurrency exchange FTX, who accused him and other celebrities of illegally promoting the platform. The suit stems from FTX’s 2022 collapse, which wiped out $8 billion of customer funds and led to founder Sam Bankman-Fried’s conviction for fraud and money laundering. O’Neal’s settlement, pending court approval, is part of broader legal actions targeting celebrities and influencers accused of endorsing risky crypto investments, with other defendants like Trevor Lawrence also settling, while some, including Tom Brady and Steph Curry, are contesting claims. The case highlights the legal risks celebrities face for crypto endorsements and involves potential class damages exceeding $10 billion.
Chinese Labor Rights Group Led by Former Tiananmen Protest Leader Closes
The China Labor Bulletin, a prominent Hong Kong-based organization founded by former Tiananmen Square protest leader Han Dongfang, announced its closure due to financial struggles and debt. Established in 1994, the group had long tracked labor unrest and factory closures in China, often advocating for workers and highlighting disputes involving foreign companies. Its shutdown comes amid a broader crackdown on civil society in Hong Kong following the 2020 imposition of Beijing’s national security law, which has targeted groups with foreign ties. Increasing surveillance and threats under China’s tightening control further pressured the organization, which had already moved out of its Hong Kong office.
General News
Supreme Court Sides With Teenager in School Disability Discrimination Case
The Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of a teenage girl with epilepsy and her family in a case against a Minnesota school district, deciding that to prove discrimination in education-related disability lawsuits, plaintiffs only need to show the school acted with “deliberate indifference” rather than a higher standard of “bad faith or gross misjudgment.” This decision, authored by Chief Justice Roberts, aligns the standard for schools with other institutions under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act, preventing a stricter burden on children with disabilities seeking accommodations. The case arose after the school district refused to provide the student with requested evening instruction accommodations, leading her to receive significantly less instruction than peers. Disability rights groups had closely monitored the case, warning that accepting the district’s argument could weaken protections for people with disabilities nationwide.
Supreme Court Revives Suit From Victims of Botched F.B.I. Raid
The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that a Georgia family wrongly raided by FBI agents—who used a battering ram and a flash-bang grenade—can revive their lawsuit against the federal government, rejecting lower courts’ previous rulings that had shielded the government from liability. The raid occurred in 2017 when agents mistakenly targeted the family’s home due to GPS errors and overlooked obvious signs they were at the wrong address. The family sued for false arrest, assault, and other claims, but the government argued sovereign immunity and discretionary function exceptions protected them. The Court clarified the legal standards under the Federal Tort Claims Act and sent the case back to lower courts to reconsider, signaling support for allowing such lawsuits when federal agents cause harm during mistaken raids.
Rich Gain and Poor Lose in Republican Policy Bill, Budget Office Finds
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found that the Republican domestic policy bill recently passed by the House would disproportionately benefit wealthy Americans while harming poorer ones. The bottom 10% of income earners would lose an average of $1,559 annually in government benefits over the next decade, largely due to cuts in safety-net programs like Medicaid and food stamps, while the top 10% would gain an average of $12,044 yearly from tax cuts. Middle-class Americans would see smaller gains, but overall, the bill’s tax cuts favor high earners who pay more taxes, and its spending cuts mainly target low-income Americans. Despite reductions in social programs, the bill is projected to add nearly $3 trillion to the national debt over 10 years, and Senate revisions are unlikely to change its regressive impact.
Senate Republicans Want to Trim Some of Trump’s Populist Tax Cuts
Senate Republicans are considering significant revisions to the House-passed $2.4 trillion domestic policy bill aligned with Trump’s agenda, seeking to trim costs by targeting some of his most popular tax proposals. Among the cuts being discussed are limitations on tax breaks for overtime pay, car loan interest, and tips, in favor of making business tax incentives permanent—policies they argue would better promote economic growth. With mounting concerns over the bill's fiscal impact, some senators, like Ron Johnson, are pushing for even deeper spending cuts and a more phased approach to implementing Trump’s priorities. At the same time, contentious issues such as changes to Medicare and the SALT deduction cap remain under scrutiny, with senators divided over how to reconcile political compromises made in the House with budgetary pressures and conservative economic principles.
Kennedy Removes All CDC Vaccine Panel Experts, New Vaccine Advisers Helped Lawyers Raise Doubts About Their Safety
U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired all 17 members of the CDC’s vaccine advisory committee, claiming the move would restore public trust and eliminate conflicts of interest, despite no evidence of significant financial misconduct. Critics, including top public health experts and lawmakers, condemned the decision as dangerous and politically motivated, warning it could severely undermine vaccine confidence and access—especially for children and pregnant women. Kennedy, a known vaccine skeptic, has already scaled back COVID-19 vaccine recommendations, slashed public health funding, and canceled vaccine research programs, prompting fears of long-term harm to national and global immunization efforts.
Three new advisers appointed by Kennedy have raised concerns by having previously participated in lawsuits questioning vaccine safety or efficacy. Kennedy now faces criticism that his new appointees—such as nurse Vicky Pebsworth, physician Robert Malone, and biostatistician Martin Kulldorff—bring their own biases due to involvement in legal actions against vaccine manufacturers or vaccine mandates. While their participation doesn’t technically violate panel rules, critics warn that it undermines the panel’s objectivity. These advisers have publicly questioned vaccine safety, served as paid expert witnesses in vaccine-related litigation, and align with skepticism about certain vaccines, sparking debate over ethics and integrity in shaping U.S. vaccine policy.
U.S. Court Agrees to Keep Trump Tariffs Intact as Appeal Gets Underway
A federal appeals court granted the Trump administration a temporary victory by allowing many of its tariffs on China and other trading partners to remain in place while legal challenges proceed. The case centers on Trump’s unprecedented use of the 1970s International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose broad import taxes as part of his economic agenda, bypassing Congress. Although a lower court ruled that the tariffs were illegal and ordered them halted, the appeals court extended a stay to keep them active during further review. The administration argues these powers are essential for negotiating trade deals and boosting domestic manufacturing, while opponents—including small businesses and states—contend the tariffs exceed presidential authority and cause financial harm. The dispute is expected to continue, potentially reaching the Supreme Court.
Judge Blocks Trump Voting Order Requiring Proof of Citizenship
A federal judge ruled that Trump likely exceeded his constitutional authority with a March executive order that imposed strict voting ID requirements and sought to penalize states for counting ballots after Election Day. The ruling, issued by Judge Denise J. Casper, blocks key provisions of the order, including those requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote and threatening federal funding cuts to non-compliant states. The judge found these measures risked widespread disenfranchisement, particularly of Black, poor, Indigenous, and other marginalized voters, and noted that the Constitution grants no specific powers over elections to the president. The ruling emphasized the potential for confusion, chaos, and loss of trust in the electoral process, while reinforcing that the power to administer elections rests primarily with the states.
E.P.A. Axes Biden’s Climate and Pollution Limits on Power Plants
The Trump administration, led by EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, announced plans to roll back Biden-era regulations limiting greenhouse gas emissions and toxic pollutants like mercury, arsenic, and lead from power plants, particularly targeting coal, oil, and gas industries. Zeldin framed the move as a boost for American energy dominance and economic growth, dismissing climate change efforts as a “cult.” The rollback would significantly weaken public health protections, despite the EPA’s own analysis estimating $130 billion in health costs from increased pollution, including premature deaths and respiratory illnesses. Critics warn that the policy endangers the environment and public health while primarily benefiting the fossil fuel industry, reversing progress on climate goals, and potentially increasing U.S. carbon emissions from the power sector, a major contributor to global greenhouse gases.
President Says Bases Will Revert to Confederate Names
Trump announced plans to restore the names of Army bases previously renamed to remove Confederate leaders’ names, reversing a change made four years ago.
National Parks Are Told to Delete Content That ‘Disparages Americans’
The Interior Department, under the Trump administration, is directing the National Park Service to remove or conceal all “inappropriate” or “negative” content about past or present Americans at national parks by September 17, 2025. Park visitors are being asked to report such content via QR-coded signs already posted at many of the 433 national sites. Historians and advocates fear this initiative—framed as eliminating divisive or anti-American ideology—could result in the erasure of crucial historical narratives involving LGBTQ+ figures, civil rights, racism, and other difficult topics. Critics argue the move is part of a broader campaign by the administration to reshape cultural and historical discourse in federal institutions.
After Anti-Trump Protests Sweep the Nation, Curfew Begins in Downtown Los Angeles
Protesters across the United States mobilized in a nationwide wave of demonstrations under the banner “No Kings,” voicing opposition to Trump’s perceived overreach, immigration policies, federal budget cuts, and his military parade coinciding with his 79th birthday. Events took place in over 2,000 locations from small towns to major cities like New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Houston, with many participants expressing patriotic sentiments. While most protests remained peaceful, tensions escalated in Los Angeles where police used tear gas and batons amid curfew enforcement and violent clashes. Other cities saw arrests, police using chemical irritants, and confrontations with counter protesters. Authorities also faced security concerns, such as credible threats that led to closing Texas’s Capitol grounds. The demonstrations highlighted widespread dissent, concerns over immigration enforcement, and the government’s use of military forces on U.S. soil.
What We Know About the Minnesota Shooting Suspect
Vance Boelter, a 57-year-old Minnesota man suspected of attacking two state lawmakers and their spouses, disguised himself as a police officer during the assaults, has a varied background including decades in the food industry, funeral services, and running a private security company with his wife. He also preached in central Africa and was involved with a Christian nonprofit. Though publicly listed with no political affiliation, a close friend said Boelter supported Trump and was passionate about anti-abortion views. Boelter had served on a state economic board with one of the victims but may not have had a personal relationship with them. Recent struggles with mental health and finances were reported before the attacks, which Minnesota officials say appear politically motivated.
National Guard Use in Los Angeles in Doubt After Court Rulings
A federal judge, Charles R. Breyer, issued an order blocking Trump from deploying California National Guard troops in Los Angeles, stating the move exceeded his legal authority and violated the Tenth Amendment. The decision, which would have returned control of the Guard to Governor Gavin Newsom, was quickly appealed by the administration, prompting the Ninth Circuit Court to pause its implementation. The ruling came amid rising national unrest, protests against immigration raids, and controversy over the treatment of a Democratic senator by federal agents. Demonstrations were expected to intensify over the weekend, coinciding with Trump’s 79th birthday military parade, while federal authorities prepared for potential legal actions stemming from the protests.
Marines, in a Rare Move, Briefly Detain Man in Los Angeles
A man named Marcos Leao, a 27-year-old Army veteran, was briefly detained by U.S. Marines outside a federal building in Los Angeles while trying to access a Veterans Affairs office, drawing attention to the rare and controversial use of federal troops in domestic policing roles. Although Leao was quickly released and said he was treated fairly, the incident has raised concerns about the Trump administration's deployment of Marines and National Guard troops to manage unrest in Los Angeles following immigration raids. The use of military personnel for law enforcement duties on U.S. soil is generally restricted by the Posse Comitatus Act, though Defense Department officials cited Title 10 as a legal basis for limited detentions. Local officials, including LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell, criticized the deployment for complicating law enforcement operations and noted limited coordination with military personnel.
Hispanic-Serving College Program Is Discriminatory, Lawsuit Argues
The group behind the Supreme Court case that ended affirmative action in college admissions, Students for Fair Admissions, has filed a new lawsuit—this time targeting the federal Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSI) program, which provides funding to colleges where at least 25% of the student body is Hispanic. Joined by the state of Tennessee, the lawsuit argues that the program is unconstitutional and discriminatory because it benefits schools based on current Hispanic enrollment rather than overall student need, thereby excluding schools with fewer Hispanic students despite also serving low-income populations. Critics say the program unfairly prioritizes one ethnic group, while supporters argue it helps under-resourced schools serving large numbers of low-income students. The challenge is part of a broader conservative push to dismantle race-based programs following the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision against affirmative action. The lawsuit names the U.S. Department of Education and Secretary Linda McMahon as defendants, with questions remaining over whether the federal government will defend the program in court.
Trump Administration Disputes Immunity Claim by Judge Accused of Obstructing ICE
Judge Hannah C. Dugan of the Milwaukee County Circuit Court has pleaded not guilty to charges of concealing a person from arrest and obstructing proceedings after allegedly helping an undocumented immigrant avoid federal immigration agents in her courtroom. Prosecutors claim she directed the man, Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, to use an alternate exit to evade arrest, though he was ultimately apprehended outside the courthouse. In seeking to dismiss the charges, Dugan’s legal team argued she is protected by judicial immunity and that the prosecution violates constitutional principles of federalism. However, the Justice Department rejected these claims, stating that judges can be prosecuted for criminal acts and that her conduct was non-judicial and obstructive. The case has drawn national attention, with nearly 150 judges signing a letter supporting Dugan and criticizing the federal government's approach. Her trial is scheduled for July 21.
Immigrant Who Prosecutors Say Was Framed for Threat Can Be Freed, Judge Says
Ramon Morales Reyes, an undocumented immigrant from Mexico, was wrongly accused by the Department of Homeland Security of threatening Trump via a letter. Prosecutors later revealed that another man, Demetric D. Scott, had forged the letter to frame Morales Reyes and prevent him from testifying in a robbery case. Although Morales Reyes was not charged with any crime related to the threats, he remained detained until an immigration judge ruled he could be released on bond, finding he posed no danger to the community. Morales Reyes’s supporters called for a correction of DHS’s misleading news release, which still featured his photo and the threatening letter despite the false accusation. The government may appeal the bond decision, but Morales Reyes’s family hopes for his swift release so he can reunite with them.
Judge Signals Openness to Granting Bail to Returned Deportee
A federal judge in Nashville signaled openness to granting bail to Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, who was returned from El Salvador to face criminal charges after his controversial deportation, marking a potential rebuke of the Trump administration that labeled him a dangerous criminal. Abrego Garcia pleaded not guilty to charges alleging involvement in an MS-13 immigrant smuggling ring, with prosecutors portraying him as a flight risk and community danger, citing accusations of domestic violence, transporting children, and sexual harassment. However, the judge expressed skepticism toward some prosecution claims based on uncorroborated cooperating witnesses. The case has exposed turmoil within the Justice Department, and while the Trump administration sought to use the criminal indictment to justify his return and bolster a tough-on-crime image, his defense argues the government’s evidence is unreliable. Meanwhile, a related civil case challenging his deportation continues amid accusations of legal violations by the administration.
Lawyers for Returned Deportee Seek Sanctions Against Trump Officials
Lawyers for Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, a Maryland immigrant wrongfully deported to El Salvador in March, have asked a federal judge to appoint a special master to investigate what they describe as the Trump administration's repeated and deliberate defiance of court orders aimed at securing Garcia’s release. Despite the administration’s eventual decision to return him to the U.S. — where he now faces criminal charges — his attorneys filed a detailed 33-page complaint accusing officials in the Justice and Homeland Security Departments of contempt, evasiveness, and possibly lying under oath. They allege the government took no meaningful steps to comply with court instructions and frequently contradicted itself in public and in court. The filing reflects deep frustration and could escalate legal scrutiny, as other federal judges across the country have similarly questioned the administration’s compliance with deportation-related rulings. Meanwhile, Garcia’s criminal case proceeds in Tennessee, where he is accused of involvement in an MS-13 smuggling conspiracy.
Trump Fights to Move Appeal of Hush-Money Conviction to Federal Court
Trump’s legal team is seeking to move his appeal of a state conviction for falsifying business records from New York state court to federal court, arguing that the Supreme Court’s 2024 ruling on presidential immunity supports their case. Trump was convicted of 34 felonies for covering up hush-money payments during his 2016 campaign, and while prosecutors maintain he acted as a private citizen, Trump’s lawyers contend some evidence stems from his time in office and thus falls under presidential immunity. Although a federal judge previously rejected this argument, Trump’s team has appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals, hoping for a more favorable outcome. Prosecutors argue the move is procedurally improper and undermines state sovereignty, while judges on the panel appeared engaged but cautious, acknowledging the broader implications for presidential powers and state authority.
Trump Removed Crypto Warnings From Retirement Plans. Will That Affect 401(k)s?
The Trump administration has reversed the Biden-era guidance warning retirement plan managers against including cryptocurrencies in 401(k) plans, instead adopting a neutral stance that leaves such decisions to fiduciaries. While this shift aligns with the administration’s broader embrace of the crypto industry, experts say it is unlikely to trigger a major influx of digital assets into retirement plans due to fiduciary liability concerns and crypto’s volatile track record. Critics argue the change eliminates helpful guardrails and increases legal risk for plan managers, especially if crypto investments fail. Despite broader access through ETFs and self-directed brokerage windows, most fiduciaries remain cautious, viewing crypto as speculative and vulnerable to hype rather than grounded in fundamentals like earnings or cash flow. Ethical concerns also persist as Trump and his family deepen their involvement in the crypto space while loosening regulatory oversight.
Blocked by Judge, U.S. Shifts Rationale for Detaining Mahmoud Khalil
A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration could no longer detain Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil under a rarely used law that deemed him a threat to U.S. foreign policy goals, citing the law as likely unconstitutional. In response, the Justice Department shifted its rationale, now claiming Khalil failed to disclose affiliations with certain organizations during his green card application process. Khalil, a legal U.S. resident and pro-Palestinian activist, has not been charged with any crime but has been detained for over three months. His lawyers argue that the allegations are retaliatory and politically motivated, stemming from his protected First Amendment activity. Although the judge questioned the legitimacy of the new allegations, he has not ordered Khalil’s release, and the case continues amid claims of government misconduct and missed deadlines, with Khalil still in custody despite his newborn child and lack of criminal accusations.
Trump’s Cartel Crackdown Imposes ‘Ruinous Burdens,’ Border Businesses Say
A new Trump administration policy requiring money services businesses in 30 ZIP codes in Texas and California to report all transactions over $200—down from the previous $10,000 threshold—has sparked backlash from small business owners and federal judges. The policy, aimed at disrupting cartel-related money laundering, has overwhelmed operators like Ashley Light of El Paso’s Valuta Corporation, who say the rule imposes crushing administrative burdens and scares off everyday customers. Judges in Texas and California have expressed doubts about the policy’s legality and effectiveness, with one calling it a “blunderbuss to target a fly.” Lawsuits challenging the policy argue that it harms legitimate businesses without significantly curbing cartel activity, which more often relies on real estate schemes or cryptocurrency. While California businesses won partial relief, most Texas operators remain subject to the rule as new lawsuits seek broader protections.
Willkie Farr Partners, Unhappy With the Firm’s Deal With Trump, Depart for Cooley
Seven partners from the law firm Willkie Farr & Gallagher announced their departure to join Cooley, a firm that successfully challenged one of Trump’s executive orders in court. This move highlights growing dissatisfaction among lawyers at firms that made deals with Trump to avoid restrictive executive orders targeting the legal industry, which barred certain lawyers from federal buildings and federal government representation. Willkie Farr had agreed to perform extensive pro bono work supporting administration causes to sidestep the orders, a deal that sparked internal criticism. The departures follow similar exits at other firms, like Paul Weiss, and underscore the ongoing reshuffling and tensions within the legal community over cooperating with Trump’s directives.
Trump Declares Dubious Emergencies to Amass Power, Scholars Say
Trump has increasingly invoked emergency powers to justify controversial actions on immigration, protests, and trade—often citing statutes that legal scholars argue do not actually authorize his decisions. Trump has declared routine challenges as national emergencies to expand executive power, such as using the Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan migrants and imposing tariffs under the guise of economic threats. Courts have largely rejected these legal justifications, viewing them as overreaches not grounded in the intended scope of emergency laws. Critics argue that Trump’s approach risks eroding constitutional protections and normalizing the use of force against political or social opponents. The Supreme Court has not yet ruled on many of Trump’s current emergency claims, but precedent from cases like Youngstown signals deep constitutional skepticism toward unchecked presidential power in times of alleged crisis.
She Relishes Being Trump’s Nemesis. Now He Is Out for Revenge.
New York Attorney General Letitia James has been a leading opponent of Trump, filing 21 lawsuits against him and his administration, including a landmark fraud case that resulted in a $450 million penalty against Trump’s business. Despite intense political backlash and repeated attacks from the president, James has remained vocal and active in challenging his policies. Now, she has become the target of a criminal investigation by Trump’s Justice Department, which is probing allegations of mortgage fraud related to two of her properties—claims her legal team denies as baseless and politically motivated. This investigation reflects a broader pattern under Trump’s second term, where the Justice Department has increasingly pursued his political adversaries, raising concerns about retribution and the weaponization of law enforcement.
Veterans Found With Stolen Military Guns and Nazi Material, Officials Say
Two masked men, Charles Ethan Fields and Levi Austin Frakes—both identified as veterans—were charged after attempting to steal combat gear from Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington State, assaulting a soldier with a hammer during the failed robbery. The investigation, sparked by a rucksack marked “Fields,” led authorities to a home in Lacey, WA, where they uncovered a disturbing cache of stolen military weapons, Nazi and white supremacist paraphernalia, and over $20,000 in cash. The men reportedly had been stealing and trading military equipment for two years. Both are facing federal charges, with more potentially forthcoming, and their actions have raised concerns about extremism among former military personnel.
Trump Talks Big on Global Diplomacy, but His Goals Are in Tatters
Trump, who campaigned in 2024 as a peacemaker capable of swiftly resolving global conflicts like the wars in Ukraine, Gaza, and tensions with Iran, is facing stark realities that have undermined his claims. Despite his confidence and efforts, including sending an inexperienced envoy and relying on personal deal-making instincts, his attempts at diplomacy have faltered amid ongoing conflicts and resistant foreign leaders like Putin, Kim Jong-un, and Xi Jinping. Trump’s impatience, sidelining of experts, and lack of coherent strategy have contributed to setbacks, including stalled peace talks and strained relations. While he still expresses hope for negotiations, critics argue his approach oversimplifies complex geopolitical issues, resulting in diplomatic failures and diminishing U.S. influence.
Explosions and Buzzing Drones Heard as Israel and Iran Exchange New Wave of Attacks
Israel launched a major military operation, “Rising Lion,” targeting Iran’s nuclear facilities and top military leaders with airstrikes and drones, prompting a swift and deadly retaliatory missile barrage from Iran. The escalation marks the most intense conflict between the two nations in decades and has raised fears of a broader regional war potentially involving the U.S. and other powers. Both nations have vowed continued action, with Israel warning of further consequences and Iran pledging harsh punishment. Meanwhile, Trump faces internal party divisions over possible U.S. involvement, as Iran pulls out of nuclear talks scheduled in Oman.
Study Shows Mercury Levels in Arctic Wildlife Could Rise for Centuries
A new study reveals that mercury levels in Arctic wildlife are continuing to rise despite global emissions plateauing, posing serious health risks to local populations, especially Indigenous communities that rely on marine mammals for food. Researchers analyzed decades of data and found that mercury, a potent neurotoxin, is being transported to the Arctic by ocean currents from centuries-old industrial emissions, making the region a contamination hotspot despite its lack of local pollution sources. The study also warns that thawing permafrost could release even more mercury, and despite international efforts like the Minamata Convention to reduce mercury use, experts say it could take centuries for the Arctic to recover.
Comments